User talk:C a r t e r 3 5
A tag has been placed on Weiling / Svizzable, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 21:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Weiling / Svizzable
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Weiling / Svizzable, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Postoak 22:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Are you reading anything that I'm putting? Or are you just being obvlivious to the fact that my post is legitimate unless you can provide sufficiant proof which contradicts this?
Thank you.
Relevant guidelines
[edit]Please read Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms and WP:NFT. Specifically, quoting from Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms, "Articles on protologisms are almost always deleted as these articles are often created in an attempt to use Wikipedia to increase usage of the term." NawlinWiki 23:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
So that's a no then.
Nowhere in the article did it encourage the use of the word.