User talk:CS42/Archive 2

Comics Cleanup

You are one of the best editors working on comics-related articles on Wikipedia. I'd like to inite you to join the new WikiProject I've started: WikiProject Comics Cleanup. Similarly to how the WP:CMC collaboration works to elevate articles to Featured Article status, the primary goal of this new project is to coordinate group cleanup efforts on articles, copy editing, condensing, and providing citations where needed. The secondary goal is to remind good editors that there are other good editors who have the same goals.

This will also help prepare articles for Wikipedia 1.0 assessment, a project I am currently working on pulling together for WP:CMC. I'd really appreciate your membership, but I do understand if you find yourself to be too busy to participate. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 18:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm kind of in a real-life transition right now, so my wikipedia edits have been spotty to say the least. I'll be happy to help out here and there as I find time to participate, however. ~CS 21:06, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Notability (comedy)

I've created Wikipedia:Notability (comedy) to help editors in deciding the notability of comedy- and humor-related articles. You are an editor whom I respect and admire. I would appreciate any commentary you may be able to provide to help hammer it into shape. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 09:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two-face

No problem, and no one got too hot-headed there. it was a good set of edits. ThuranX 01:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Batman (and Bruce Wayne) as Criminals

I don't think comic book characters are as clear cut and one dimensional as you are making Batman out to be. I gave at least one example of a supposed villian (Poison Ivy) who believes he is the real criminal and I've listed other criminals who were created as a result of the toxic chemicals produced by Wayne Enterprises. When we get to the military contracts made to the U.S. we are talking about weapons that are sometimes misused to kill or otherwise traumatize civilians. If the claim can be made that Wayne Enterprises is "green" then a counter-point should be allowed concerning Wayne Chemicals and Wayne Oil. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nihilozero (talk • contribs) 14:52, 17 October 2006.

Fixed layout

So, I believe I have repaired the layout problems I was trying to fix earlier: The page should have a orange stripe intersecting a green stripe with the Wikipedia Signpost aligned to one side. Something in the div class of the archive box or Chris' RfA announcement were conflicting with the Infobox. In IE, the Infobox was pushing everything else down to the bottom of the screen. In Firefox it was pushing the RfA announcement, the archive box and all the "edit" functions for each message header down to the bottom of the page. I worked around the archive box for now -- but if anyone more markup and css savvy than I knows what was causing this, I'm still curious. ~CS 05:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Johanna Draper Carlson

Hey, you queried Johanna's role at DC. Johanna used to be big back on Usenet way back, and did work at DC, see [1]. Hope that clears it up. I've "known" Johanna for over ten years now, in that weird internet way of reading their posts to various boards and lists. Steve block Talk 07:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, hey that does sound familiar. Sorry about the mistake. I'm also familiar with Johanna through RAC*'s heyday and the Delphi/Vhive forums. I guess when you said "editor" DCOnline didn't leap to mind. ~CS 18:57, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I can see that, it could probably stand a tweak. What I was trying to get across was that Johanna would certainly count as a professional expert in the field, which is what the sourcing policies are now pushing for as a determination of a reliable source. Can't say I recognise your user name from the old boards, has it changed or where you an inveterate lurker like me? Steve block Talk 17:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't been a rac* regular for years -- I was much more active on alt.comics.batman in the late 90's and early 00's where I posted as "~Chris." My posting on the Delphi and offspring forums has been pretty inconsistant -- I go through phases where I'm pretty active in the current events and political forums, followed by long periods of lurking. ~CS 19:33, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't ring a bell. I haven't been on a delphi board in ages, I thought they shut them all down, I remember Warren Ellis closing his down. I don't really have any net presence outside here nowadays, to be honest. Still, nice to bump into someone who remembers it all the way it used to be. I tended to lurk on RAC.LSH, misc and Vertigo around the same period. Take it easy. :)

John Henry

I know you weren't vandalizing, which is why I summarized it as "rv old v". RV old vandalism. :) --Golbez 01:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

section move

Be careful, moving sections can lead to rebukes and hassles. If you check the gotham City page history, you'll see that Chris griswold reverted other section moves, you may find yours reverted too. Don't know why, civility and wiki-conventions say put new at the bottom,but whatever. Just be warned. ThuranX 23:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that the only reason Chris reverted that old section was because someone moved a very old coversation around for no reason. I was simply moving a brand-new conversation to the bottom of the page because, as you say, the convention is to put new conversations on the bottom. ~CS 00:17, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joker origins

Great quote for explaining his creators and real world origins! Nice cite and all. ThuranX 18:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shimmer (comics)

Hi. Per Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Advice for admins when dealing with copyright violations it is necessary to delete the article, then use the undelete function to restore the untainted revisions. I hope that clarifies what happened. Sadly it is not enough to simply remove the offending text, it also has to be deleted from the page history to prevent it being mistakenly re-added. I have attempted to restore the articles as best I can. I hope that explains what happened. Steve block Talk 00:51, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. Thanks for re-adding. as a non-admin, I generally try to cull out plagarised material when I encounter it, and leave the deletion of the history to others. ~CS 02:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Batman love interests

Good call on nominating it for deletion. A list needs AfD, not CfD, though. Doczilla 09:10, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

barbara boxer rose image

yeah, it's public domain as the tag states. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kevin Baas (talk • contribs) 17:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

American comicbooks

What makes you think either the snowman or when the wind blows are based on american comicbooks? --Fredrick day 20:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both films are based on graphic novels by Raymond Briggs -- and you're right, they're not American, they're British, much like Tank Girl, Judge Dredd and V for Vendetta. There's a discussion on the article's talk page right now about making the article "English language" rather than "American"-centric.

List of films based on American comic books

Ahhhhhh I was just tagging mine favoured option on the end and hand't realised it was laid out all fancy ;) I've now switched it around so it makes sense now (more sense and that is all I aim for, unless I'm deliberately not I suppose). (Emperor 23:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:JohnHenry.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:JohnHenry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 00:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Testing

Testing why I can't seem to edit... 5...4...3...2...1... ~CS 02:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: "Ledger" Poster Image

I put the image up for IfD here. You may want to add the info you have to that nom.

— J Greb 20:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. And I added a note to the uploader's page explaining what the image is actually of as well. ~CS 20:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tank girl

I have to say, I didn't look at the article - the categories "LGBT characters in comics" and "Fictional bisexuals" told me all I needed. Satyrbot has certainly been having problems, but this is mostly because categories have been put in stupid places rather than it's tagging wrong articles. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re Killer Moth in the live action section of List of Batman enemies

IIUC the line was added due to the un-aired pilot short that was prepped for a Batgirl series to lead into the West/Ward Batman in its third season.

While the short has been uploaded to YouTube, it isn't a fan-film.

- J Greb 02:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi J -- Killer Moth did appear in the unaired introduction to Batgirl in the Adam West TV show, but this isn't what the anon was adding. "Batman vs. Killer Moth" is one of a couple farces produced by some teenagers and put up on YouTube. Shane Steele is one of the guys involved in making these. You can see the films and their credits here and here. Not that I'd ever want to discourage teenagers to play with making their own movies -- it's just not notable enough to include in a Wikipedia article. ~CS 03:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point, I wasn't aware of the fan-film in question (bad assumption on my part). It may be worthwhile though to include the Killer Moth from the pilot since it was done by the same production company that fielded the 1960's Batman.

Could you also take a look at the revised blurb for the 'Moth in the list? I think it may be the same source that changed it.

— J Greb 03:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have a DVD of Batman TV oddities with the pilot and credits at home -- I'll be sure to check the info and update it this weekend. Tim Herbert played Moth in this version.

You're right -- the user moved Killer Moth to the major villains section and removed information about more recent incarnations to match his fan-film. I'll correct it. ~CS 03:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]