User talk:COrmsbee1

Your submission at Articles for creation: KEC42 (October 6)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KEC42.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pratyya ^(Hello!) 15:08, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KEC42 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KEC42, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KEC42

Hello COrmsbee1. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "KEC42".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KEC42}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KEC42 (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Arthur goes shopping was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KEC42 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Arthur goes shopping (talk) 07:24, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! COrmsbee1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 07:24, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Oregon

Hi COrmsbee1,

You are invited to join WikiProject Oregon, a group of editors working on improving articles about Oregon. I thought you might be interested, based on some of your contributions to Wikipedia. Happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KEC42

The article KEC42 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable on its own. No incoming links. There is no article on the pertinent WFO to merge to, nor is there a list of NWR transmitters.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:00, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The link that's provided shows a map of the transmitters of each NOAA Weather Radio Station in the United States, including Alaska, Hawaii and all overseas dependent territories. Instead of deletion - I'll attempt to merge the article with the NOAA Weather Radio page. C.L. Swisher 00:15, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WWF97

The article WWF97 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable on its own. No incoming links. There is no article on the pertinent WFO to merge to, nor is there a list of NWR transmitters.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:15, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KIH37

The article KIH37 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable on its own. No incoming links. There is no article on the pertinent WFO to merge to, nor is there a list of NWR transmitters.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:15, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]