User talk:COSMO1994

Welcome!

Hello, COSMO1994, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Ontario Craft Brewers does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:40, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.

May 2018

Hello, COSMO1994, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Katemasdon12 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:44, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Another attempt to hide other people reporting possible violations of site policies on your part will result in a block. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Your recent editing history at Ontario Craft Brewers shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:51, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're obviously either a sockpuppet or coworker of Katemasdon12. Even if you weren't, it's obvious that your only purpose is to edit war to insert copyright violations to promote a business, all of which we don't take to kindly too. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Katemasdon12 has been renamed to Kathy from Paddington School. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:46, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

COSMO1994 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

just want to update a page that has not been updated in years with accurate information. Other users keep undoing information and posting updated and inaccurate information.

Decline reason:

The edits of yours that I looked at were completely inappropriate, obvious violations of WP:COI, WP:PAID, and/or WP:PROMO. Likely, WP:SOCK, too. Yamla (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to blank reviewed unblock requests for active blocks. Please do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 18:13, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]