User talk:CKarnstein

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 16:37, July 21, 2005 (UTC)

Mineko Iwasaki

Greetings. Your last edit was very good and has made the sub-section on Memoirs of a Geisha just about right IMHO. I think it can stand alone for a while, though perhaps extra bits can be added if anyone else has something to contribute. It's important to try to be partisan, but it does appear that Golden was extremely insensitive at best and deceitful at worst.

Cheers, John Smith's 11:48, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I think we've both managed to improve the article a lot. The Memoirs information is important, but I didn't want it to get too controversial or overshadow information about Iwasaki's life. She is such an interesting woman in her own right. CKarnstein 05:03, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ludwig II

Thanks for the help! -Maaya 16:09, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geisha

That was a lovely bit of cleanup and rewriting you did on the Geisha article. Thank you for fixing that up. --Iriseyes 18:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Memento

Just came by to say thanks for your edits on the Memento page. That was terrific copyediting (and all in one edit!), especially for such a confusing and hard-to-describe film. Thanks a bunch.--Dark Kubrick 01:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It is a challenging film to summarize, and I'm sure there's still plenty of room for improvement in the article. CKarnstein 03:02, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Autism

Nice changes! Good work. WLU 23:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Back Dorm Boys

Hi. Thanks to you too, for correcting my grammar many times. English isn't my mother language, so I can't write it very well. But back there, I really want to add some infos on the Back Dorm Boys page, so I can't resist it. I'll try to put some more work on that (and maybe another pages too) when I got some new informations. See you! Th3 m4rt1n 18:29, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Canticle for Leibowitz

CKarnstein, I see you've shown some interest in the A Canticle for Leibowitz article in the past. I'm interested in bringing it to GA status soon and am soliciting your help. A number of revisions have been made in the past few weeks to position it for a successful nomination process. Would you mind reviewing the article and make suggestions/changes to assist in the process? Any assistance you can provide will be appreciated. Thank you.
Jim Dunning | talk 03:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hercules

You recently cut the differences with mythology section in Hercules: The Legendary Journeys. Most of that stuff, if not all of it, is verifiable by the individual links to the appropriate articles. Do you still think each example requires a citation when the stories are readily available here? Erikeltic (talk) 17:46, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think each example requires a citation because, as I said when I edited it, the list was excessively long and trivial. Most of those examples shouldn't be there at all, cited or uncited. CKarnstein (talk) 18:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can we agree to at least pick a couple of the gems? Personally, I think the fact that's about a "Greek" character and he was given his Roman analogue's name is a riot. I think there should be at least 3-5 good examples. Erikeltic ^(Talk) 19:28, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What picture is appropriate for the "Afghan" article?

I noticed your recent (Feb. 2013) edit to the Afghan article. Please feel free to weigh in on the discussion at Afghan#What picture is appropriate?. --Bejnar (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]