User talk:CGT dk

Welcome

Hello, CGT dk! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:44, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of CGT dk/Ældste/106

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CGT dk/Ældste/106 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ∫e^b²+1_(talk) 17:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Limbo supercentenarians

Hi. I'm probably asking this question wrong guy but why so many supercentenarians case come limbo, that there are no update over year or two so we wont know if person has passed away or is he/she still alive?. Like Sobayia Sarran who has been limbo over two years and there is no single mention that she has passed away. Or Elsie Ward, oldest person from St Lucia who has mention at her 110:th birthday but no any mention about 111:th birthday. So if person has passed away then why it has not mentioned at newspaper or something that we know that person has passed away so we don't have to expect that he/she is still alive?62.72.229.12 (talk) 17:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Year End Championships

There are event championships that happen at the end of the year, and there are "The Year End Championships." Huge difference! You seem to be confusing the two up at the Caroline Wozniacki career statistics. The secondary event at the end of the year is for players that don't make the cut for the official "Year-end Championship." By the way your editing pattern looks very similar to banned editor User:Ryoung122. I sure hope you aren't the same person. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:33, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of cause I know the difference. It is not at the same level as a tournament but are several places put in the same category. In the section Statistical Information there are six categories. One of them are

"... the year-end championships (the WTA Tour Championships and the Tournament of Champions), ..." marked with a yellow colour. Please tell me why it is wrong to think that the two tournaments are considered to be in the same category, when they are in the tables "Schedule" and "Titles won by player/nation" where Andrea Petkovic' win in Sofia are in that category ...? btw Your edit has messed up the count of finales without a proper correction and removed other useful information. And be careful with hasty accusations. CGT dk (talk) 01:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let me be less accusatory and simply ask if you are the same person as Ryoung122? When readers look at the infobox and charts and see year-end championship totals, they correctly make the assumption they are the totals from the Official Year-End Championships... not the lesser tournament. If they get confused because the performance timeline seems to be a bit ambiguous with its categories, then we may need to look at that to make it less so. But we don't need to compound the problem. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:37, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Elza Brandeisz in Gerontology Wiki

Hi, I have a question to you: Are you the same user like in Gerontology Wiki. If yes, so perhaps it would be possible to correct the article about Elza Brandeisz. Becaus she isn't born in Budapest but in Rust in austrian county burgenland. It was at this time a part of hungary. (see here, but only in german) - If you an other user, so sorry and forget this message. regards from Austria.-- K@rl 09:15, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]