User talk:CEALIV

Welcome!

Hello, CEALIV, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Charles Edward Lincoln III, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Chzz ► 03:52, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charles Edward Lincoln III

The article Charles Edward Lincoln III has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article does not meet the general notability guidelines - for inclusion, an article requires significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The only source here is a primary source, hence the article is not verifiable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chzz ► 03:52, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Charles Edward Lincoln III has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://charleslincoln3.wordpress.com/ (matching the regex rule \bwordpress\.com).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:03, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Charles Edward Lincoln III do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://charleslincoln3.wordpress.com/ (matching the regex rule \bwordpress\.com).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:11, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Charles Edward Lincoln III

I have nominated Charles Edward Lincoln III, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Edward Lincoln III. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tan | 39 14:13, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Identity

Are you Charles Edward Lincoln III? Tan | 39 23:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No I am clearly not my initials are CEALIV not CELIII.

Are you related? Tan | 39 00:04, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No I am not Charles Edward Lincoln III, do realise this, and drop the claims that I am, kindly.

I didn't claim you were. I asked if you were, you said no, and I asked if you were related - as in his son Charlie, who would be Charles IV... matching your initials. Being disingenuous about any conflict of interest certainly isn't going to help anything. Tan | 39 04:31, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Lincoln AfD and reply

Hi. Re your comment/question on my talkpage, I know nothing about him personally or biographically, but I'm reasonably familiar with the Mesoamericanist / archaeological literature and have come across his Chichen Itza ideas before. The rest I just had to read up about.

What will happen, is that the deletion discussion will run its course (7 days or thereabouts), after which some closing administrator will come along and assess whether to keep or delete. Right now, experience tells that it is not looking good for a 'keep' result, though one never knows. Experience also shows that when several new user accounts not previously involved with anything on wikipedia spring up and start commenting on deletion debates, those comments are pretty much always disregarded (whatever they say). Whenever there is any potential conflict of interest (COI) or involvement by some party, it's usually for the best for that party to be forthright about it up-front, that way any potential misunderstandings and suspicions can be dealt with. The same goes with the undisclosed operation of multiple user accounts, called sockpuppets here on wikipedia. I can't say for sure whether either has been occurring in this particular AfD discussion, but COI and SOCK actions are usually seen in a negative light.

I have made such arguments for keep as I saw fit, though with the caveat that the text be seriously overhauled if not rewritten altogether. See also my further comments/recommendations there. Regards, --cjllw ʘ TALK 07:48, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]