User talk:CDOS lives

message to ryulong- just because im a blocked user doesnt mean all my edits are unconstructive. i was clarifying a mistake in the uighur people article before, the uighur script was NOT used for writing mongolian and manchu but its descendants were. This doesnt mean you should revert all my edits and continue to lead people to be misinformed

oh yeah and the original reason why i was blocked was because i was placing a sockpuppet template on someones page, not for harrasing users. plus that user was falsely accusing me of being a sockpuppet of the wrong person deliberately, although i previously had an unconstructive sock before.

i request the blocking log be updated and noted that i was blocked for sockpuppetry, not harrasment.

Block

This account has been blocked for sockpuppetry.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:02, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just like User:Count Dooku of Serenno was. Unless you're referring to your original account, Huangdi, which I did not block at all?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:04, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

how about removing the sockpuppet template on huangdi. do a checkuser, im not that ip adress which is located in hong kong. apparently the user thinks its fun too repetedly accuse me of being able to magically fly from north america to hong kong.

and i know all admins have the capability of updating the block log. change reason to sockpuppetry because i DID NOT harass, i just did what that user was doing to me.

recent changes patrol get ryulong here.

and im not justifying posting a sockpuppet template on someones page, if he did it and he wasnt blocked for that, then im not supposed to be either.

But you are User:Nefbmn, User:ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ, and User:Vietnameseischinesenotcantoneseisvietnamese which is most definitely abuse of multiple accounts.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:54, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]