User talk:CDCDTory

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CDCDTory (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

these accounts are used by different people who share the same computer!

Decline reason:

That makes them role accounts, then, so we're not likely to unblock them. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:32, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CDCDTory (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

these accounts are used by different people who share the same computer! To be completely accurate: these accounts are individual accounts Daniel Case used by different people who share the same computer, surely not unusual!!

Decline reason:

It is clear that all of you are working together to disrupt the St Benedict's School article, or you are all the same person; in either case, the intent was the same, and blocking is still warranted. –MuZemike 20:05, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CDCDTory (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

MuZemike, and others, none of this is true and will be seen to be false by anyone looking at the activity properly. How, in what way, are any of the edits of the article you cite disruptive and where is your evidence for anyone working together/being the same person? If you examine edits made in the history of this article you wil see that none are reverts and none are contentious. We, the account holders using this computer, all share an interest in improving/maintaining this article in good condition, just like we all like photography and summer walks. There is no basis for this block, please unblock.

Decline reason:

Accounts are not to be shared. One account per person, please. Nakon 06:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.