User talk:CCFSDCA

Reproducing material verbatim with permission

Hi there

I notice you're adding articles to Wikipedia about national holidays, with a line stating that the material is reproduced with the permission of the author.

It's possible to use copyright material here with an author's permission, but it's not acceptable simply to state that the author has given permission - if it's quoted directly from someone else's work, then the material must be formally donated to Wikipedia by the author. This is because anything published on Wikipedia is then freely available to anyone else to reproduce and use, and the author must understand and permit this. I'm not trying to put you off contributing to the encyclopaedia, but I wanted to be sure you understood the process for using copyrighted material, and had gone through it correctly before creating your articles. If not, your articles will probably end up being deleted by another editor, which is a shame if you're giving up your time and efforts to add useful content.

If you are the author of the book you are citing and want to donate your material to Wikipedia, then the process is explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the author but you've obtained permission from him to use the material, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission explains what form the permission should take and how to let Wikipedia know that it has been obtained.

If you know about the process and have gone through it correctly, please accept my apologies for troubling you. If not, if might be advisable to do so before adding any more copyrighted material.

Cheers Ka renjc 20:47, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ccfsdca

A tag has been placed on Ccfsdca requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Aka042 (talk) 19:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ccfsdca, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Kosh^Jumpgate 19:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion Tag on Ccfsdca

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Ccfsdca, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. --Aka042 (talk) 19:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Christopher corbett-fiacco

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Christopher corbett-fiacco, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Christopher corbett-fiacco seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Christopher corbett-fiacco, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of International mountain day

A tag has been placed on International mountain day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 21:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ceremonie-yam

A tag has been placed on Ceremonie-yam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. pablo_hablo. 21:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Garifuna settlement day

A tag has been placed on Garifuna settlement day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. pablo_hablo. 21:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Prince rainier's day

A tag has been placed on Prince rainier's day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. pablo_hablo. 21:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

welcome

Welcome!

Hello, CCFSDCA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Ysangkok (talk) 22:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scuse me

if I'm wrong, but you appear to be creating pages about holidays whose only reference is a book written by Christopher Corbett-Fiacco. On some of these pages you say that verbatim quotes are with the permission of the author - who you claim to be.

Now I'm by no means an expert, but I don't think that this right. There are a number of policies and guidelines about what should be included here. Some deal with:

Notability WP:Notability
Conflict of interest WP:COI ie when a user creates or edits a page about themselves
Original research WP:OR where a user uses Wikipedia as a forum for their work
Advertising WP:Advert where the site is being used to promote a person or product.

There may (and probably are) others that apply in this case.

Please can you take a look at them before you create more articles? pablo_hablo. 23:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello, CCFSDCA. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Ani#User:CCFSDCA. Thank you.Toddst1 (talk) 00:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns about your editing

The articles you are adding to wikipedia are giving rise to concern, on a couple of fronts:

You appear to be using wikipedia to promote your book. You'll esily understand that we frown on that sort of thing.
You are signing articles, or putting tags in them like "(Text quoted by permission of author Christopher Corbett-Fiacco from The Whole World Calendar Book of Holidays Around the World.)". If you're clever enough to write a book, you are celever enough to appreciate that this is not an acceptable style for a wikipedia article.

I must advise you to take more care in the way you edit - if you are genuinely uncertain, read the pages linked from the welcome message, above.

We do welcome new contributors, but equally we can quickly lose patience with people who obstinately refuse to learn. Please do not become one of them. thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 00:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note especially this notice in the edit window: 'You irrevocably [emphasis mine] agree to release your contributions under the terms of the GFDL', In other words, you're donating, irrevocably, the text to the project and no longer have any exclusive claim to it. Be sure that's what you want to do. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 01:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Corbett-Fiacco: The Whole World Calendar Book of Holidays Around the World 2010-2015

About this book. Can you provide any evidence whatsoever that it exists? Googling for it does not find it. That is not normal for a publication.

Could I urgently suggest that you find other citations for the information you're adding. --Tagishsimon (talk) 00:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding articles

Christopher, thanks for your note. My comments and advice:

I do not find a citation from an unpublished book acceptable, for the reason that no-one bar the small circle who have access to the manuscript can verify the citation.
I very much welcome the addition of the articles and agree they are notable.
I would thus wish that the articles had alternate citations or no citation.
You might want to consider listing holidays for a country in an appropriately named article - Public holidays in Poland, for instance. Category:Public holidays by country provides a long list of such articles; new ones can be created for countries not already served. We tend to discourage small articles which are unlikely to grow beyond a bare few lines, preferring to group content into larger articles.

Hope this helps. --Tagishsimon (talk) 17:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]