User talk:CBKAtTopsails

Welcome!

Hello, CBKAtTopsails, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Based on your edits, you may be interested in the discussions that occur at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics; please review the main project page Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics for guidelines on style and content. In particular, could you please remove your signature from the article on nondeterministic finite state machines ? It is inapproprorate to sign content in this way; the article history makes a comprehensive record of a user's edits. linas 14:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CFG

To respond to your question on my home page (which I may delete after a while): I was very surprised to see extra terminals being allowed on the left hand side of a CFG rule. As far as I recall this makes the formalism equivalent to context-*sensitive* grammars - but I'd have to check that. In any case, it does make the rules context-sensitive in the literal sense. Rp 09:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My Mistake

While I was doing editing on CFG, my mind was thinking about G (grammar) which allows terminals to appear on the left side. --CBKAtTopsails 14:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please remain civil, and assume good faith.

You have no right to call my edit malicious, as you did here. I have done my utmost best to explain on the talk page why that is an improvement, and it should be apparent to you – even in the face of your apparent lack of understanding of basic grammatical properties of the English language – that my edit was motivated by my desire to improve the quality of Wikipedia. Did you read any of the Wikipedia policies and guidelines I recommended you to read? Please also read Civility and Etiquette – you are not somehow elevated above the rules. Each time you edit an article, there is a note that states "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly ... by others, do not submit it." If you can't live with that, and you are unable to abide by the rules we have set up here to make Wikipedia possible, then you should not edit here. --Lambiam 22:26, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Lambiam. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Temperal^{talk and matrix?} 20:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Re: Comment

Pointing it out courteously is not a personal attack. Hastily tagging it as malicious and then posting a hostile response on the user's talk page is. Temperal^{talk and matrix?} 22:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't distort the facts one bit. Why don't you take it to Wikipedia:Requests for mediation and see what they think? Temperal^{talk and matrix?} 22:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know Lambiam, if that's what you're suggesting. I just happened to encounter him over the Fermat's Last Theorem Article. I just saw your attack and decided to warn you. If you don't stop your continual rudeness, I will bring this to the Mediation Committee. If you want diffs, here you go.

Temperal^{talk and matrix?} 02:33, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent rudeness

In view of your persistent rudeness I am not inclined to engage in further discussion with you. --Lambiam 16:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comments: "the" verifier or "a" verifier?

FYI. I have opened an RfC on this question. See Talk:P = NP problem#Request for comments: "the" verifier or "a" verifier?. You receive this message because you are one of the participants in the earlier discussion. --Lambiam 08:53, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Union of two regular languages for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Union of two regular languages, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Union of two regular languages until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]