User talk:CAFESDO

Michael Stinziano

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Michael Stinziano, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://michaelstinziano.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2&Itemid=2.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 02:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Todd McKenney (Ohio) for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Todd McKenney (Ohio), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd McKenney (Ohio) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 15:06, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kristina Roegner for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Kristina Roegner, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristina Roegner until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 15:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lynn Slaby for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Lynn Slaby, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynn Slaby until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 15:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Henne for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Michael Henne, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Henne until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 15:10, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Stinziano for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Michael Stinziano, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Stinziano until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 15:11, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sherwood (talk) 15:12, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. WuhWuzDat 15:13, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Duffey for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Mike Duffey, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Duffey until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 15:14, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anne Gonzales for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Anne Gonzales, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Gonzales until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 15:15, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Dovilla for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Mike Dovilla, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Dovilla until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 15:16, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marlene Anielski for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Marlene Anielski, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlene Anielski until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 15:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bill Patmon for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Bill Patmon, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Patmon until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 15:18, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of deletion notices

Please don't remove {{afd}} notices from articles. If you believe the page shouldn't have been deleted, feel free to contribute to the deletion debate instead. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 15:19, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Todd McKenney (Ohio), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. WuhWuzDat 15:19, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew Brenner for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Andrew Brenner, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Brenner until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 15:20, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Craig Newbold for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Craig Newbold, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Newbold until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 15:21, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CAFESDO for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. WuhWuzDat 20:54, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of E. J. Thomas

The article E. J. Thomas has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Drmies (talk) 23:14, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of E.J. Thomas

The article E.J. Thomas has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Top Jim (talk) 23:26, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OSUHEY for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:28, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ohio House

I don't think all the Ohio House templates are worth having. I have had United States House templates TFDed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:50, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:OHHouse1

A tag has been placed on Template:OHHouse1, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

CSD G6 - TfD at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 February 10#Template:OHHouse1 closed as "delete". Also delete ALL templates in the category, as per tfd!!!!.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:29, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]