User talk:C00483033

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosicrucian Order of Alpha et Omega. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors.

Since you've already broken the 3RR rule here - the correct thing to do is to self-revert. --Kim D. Petersen 14:37, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked 24 hours for WP:3RR at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosicrucian Order of Alpha et Omega. When your block expires, please refrain from continuing to post your complaints at the AFD/article talkpage. The correct venue is the administrator's noticeboard/incidents page.--Isotope23 ^talk 15:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Hermetic_Order_of_the_Golden_Dawn,_Inc.. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Coldmachine^Talk 17:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

spamming

Please stop spamming that post at AFD and talkpages. The correct place to post this is at WP:ANI. Continuing to add that editor's comment to multiple article talkpages and AFD discussions is disruptive.--Isotope23 ^talk 19:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

501(c)

No, they are listed.

Show 	  « Prev |  1-1 | Next » 
Name 	City 	State 	Country 	Code
Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn Inc. (Until December 2010) 	New Prt Rchy 	FL 	USA 	--
« Prev | 1-1 | Next »

It's not my fault you don't know how to use the IRS search page. GlassFET 22:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They are not only listed in the online search, they are listed in the full eopub780607.txt document, between Hermetic Order of the Blue Star Inc. and Hermie and Elliott Sadler Foundaton Inc.. Again, see for yourself:

Hermetic Order of the Blue Star Inc.                                                                      Los Angeles                    CA                             
Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn Inc.                                                                    New Prt Rchy                   FL         Until December 2010 
Hermie and Elliott Sadler Foundaton Inc.                                                                  Emporia                        VA

Maybe you were incorrectly looking at the addendum? GlassFET 22:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus

Yeah, you're right, there was no consensus. And when there is no consensus, our deletion policy says the article should be kept. The AfD was supposed to be ended at the end of day 5, when the result would have been keep. So go complain at deletion review if you want, it will do you no good. GlassFET 23:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been indefinitely blocked, because evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Frater FiatLux (2nd) has shown that this account is a sockpuppet or meatpuppet of User:Frater FiatLux used to circumvent Wikipedia policies. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Akhilleus (talk) 21:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]