User talk:Bzero5

Welcome!

Hello, Bzero5, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Cirt (talk) 04:24,

January 2014

Hello, I'm JamesMoose. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldcoin that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JamesMoose (talk) 05:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bzero5. You have new messages at JamesMoose's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Blocked

I've blocked this account indefinitely for sockpuppetry per the findings of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kevoras. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bzero5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was blocked for using a mobile device in an area of someone with socks? then you mighy as block the whole region named China. unblock me pls. this is ridiculous dude. i advice also looking into the conduct of the dude that blocked me. i thibk he did so cause he is losing an arguement. and decided to use cheap tactics. i will hope wikipedia is better than this. leaving u the decision.

Decline reason:

According to the investigation report, the determination in your case was behavioral, not technical. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 05:37, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bzero5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

behaviour evidence to block me? what? all i did was support an article. if u guys are going to block any article then dont freaking call for a vote where every asshole can block supporters. jesus christ. i thought wikipedia is better than this

Decline reason:

Declined without review due to foul language and incivlity in request. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bzero5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was blocked due to the following reason, 'misspelling the word notable' which is same as a sockpuppeteer. english is my 2nd language. and i in fact never used the word notable before this exposure. i simply used the word as how a sock spelled it and got grouped together as such. i find this hardly good evidence. i was also told i m in the same geographical location. though this i really cant help, china is a large place. i wish for a reinvestigation for my case only, to be unblocked.

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for "misspelling the word notable". You are blocked because a number of different facts all point to this account's being a sockpuppet. In addition to the evidence mentioned in the sockpuppet investigation, I have found other evidence which points in the same direction, and I see no grounds for unblocking. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:20, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.