User talk:Bysulrahiman

a45ajd7n2a

Speedy deletion nomination of Version : 19:04:2016

Hello Bysulrahiman,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Version : 19:04:2016 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. AnAwesomeArticleEditor (talk) 13:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

what is use? Bysulrahiman (talk) 11:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 19 April 2016

Hello Bysulrahiman,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 19 April 2016 for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. AnAwesomeArticleEditor (talk) 13:55, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:05, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no problem Bysulrahiman (talk) 11:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, I'm JMHamo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Administrators have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JMHamo (talk) 08:53, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:13, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

what is your problem? Bysulrahiman (talk) 11:15, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe I have a problem. We routinely block people who engage in unconstructive editing, and I can't find a single edit by this account that was helpful in any way. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:41, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]