User talk:Byoungja3

Message from your BI481 TA

Hi Jae,

Please add a link to your user page back to the NeuroJoe/BI481 Spring 2011 wiki page. Thank you.

Roberto Carcinos Mitos (talk) 19:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Byoungja3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Welcome

I am a member of the medicine and neuroscience wikiprojects. I find your term project very interesting, so I only wanted to say hello, and offer my help for any questions you have (either about neuroscience, although my field is neuropsychology and not basic neuroscience, or about wikipedia in general). Feel free to post any questions or requests at my talk page and try to have fun around here... Bests.--Garrondo (talk) 18:24, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Hi Byoungja3, thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I am writing to let you know that I think you may not fully understand the WP:Peer Review process. You have recently started peer reviews for Excitatory synapse, Summation (neurophysiology), and Synaptic gating, but in none of these did you indicate what your plans for the articles are (do you want to improve them to Good Article or even Featured Article) and you did not provide any guideance for reviewers. Instead you made comments as if you yourself were doing a brief "peer review" of the articles in question. On Wikipedia, such comments are better left on the article's talk page, or, if a peer review has already been opened, on a peer review page. Please do not open any more peer reviews just to leave comments, but feel free to ask for a peer review on an article you have put a lot of time and effort into improving. Thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 18:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]