User talk:Buzztrack

March 2020

Hello Buzztrack. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Nagarro, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Buzztrack. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Buzztrack|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 08:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In response to March 2020

Hello Bonadea. As suggested, I have added the paid template to my talk page in full disclosure. I am an employee and the changes were made to reflect accurate information that was edited out. The page has also been edited several times earlier by unregistered users reflecting incorrect information. Buzztrack (talk) 16:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Buzztrack[reply]

Thank you for posting the disclosure! It is of course important that Wikipedia articles do not contain incorrect information. Feel free to use the article talk page, Talk:Nagarro to suggest changes; you can put the template {{request edit}} on the page (just copy that code including the curly brackets) and below that bring up any incorrect facts that need to be changed, with reliable sources for the new information. Thanks! --bonadea contributions talk 17:58, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! In that respect, would the article still contain the paid tag? The edit I made was the only one and has been reversed already and I now understand how to suggest changes. Please suggest if something further is required.Buzztrack (talk) 12:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Melmann

Hello, Buzztrack. You have new messages at Melmann's talk page.
Message added 15:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Melmann 15:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nagarro logo new.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nagarro logo new.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]