User talk:Buttnugget126589

August 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Chester Bennington, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 23:39, 8 August

If you want your changes to stick, and not be undone right away, I'd recommend provided reliable sources that back up what you're trying to say. Additionally, it would help if you discussed things on articles talk pages. Explanations and reasons, not just blunt statements like "This needs to change." Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 20:31, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

If you change Linkin Park again without getting agreement to your change in advance, you will be blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 22:58, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't edit Linkin Park pages, and don't know anything about their music. You need to discuss it with people on Talk:Linkin Park, not with me.—Kww(talk) 01:06, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: LINKIN PARK http://www.allmusic.com/album/living-things-mw0002357741

The source also states they are pop-metal, but you aren't going to change their genre to that are you? They play a broad range of genres, rock is a more general and suitable classification because of this. The1337gamer (talk) 20:38, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: http://www.allmusic.com/album/living-things-mw0002357741 LINKIN PARK

As before no, because many of their songs don't have any rapping, rock is just a generalisation, there is no point classifying them as one of the many subgenres they are. The1337gamer (talk) 20:46, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: LINKIN PARK http://www.allmusic.com/album/living-things-mw0002357741

Rap metal is not more suitable because they have plenty of songs that are not rap metal, rock is a better generalisation, stop changing it and discuss on the band talk page first. The1337gamer (talk) 20:43, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:45, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Linkin Park, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Linkin Park, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 20:54, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Linkin Park, you may be blocked from editing. The1337gamer (talk) 21:00, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Linkin Park, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The1337gamer (talk) 21:36, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:14, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Buttnugget126589, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]