User talk:Buttletsaregone

Buttletsaregone, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Buttletsaregone! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Friendsunagi.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Friendsunagi.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The One with the Fake Monica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Crane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Friendsunagi.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Friendsunagi.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Friends (season 10) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The One at the Beach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montauk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Buttletsaregone. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! TruthToBeSpoken (talk) 10:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I'm Dan56. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to London Calling seemed less than neutral, unfaithful to the source cited, and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 10:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Daily Vault

Hi there,

I can't help but notice that you have added links to The Daily Vault to a lot of articles recently. Are you affiliated with this site?

--Best wishes, Nerdtrap (talk) 23:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not.

You need to explain why you're adding so many links to this website. Keep in mind that disclosure of paid editing is mandatory. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:09, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding a lot of reviews from The Daily Vault simply because I can't find any other website with so many reviews (that haven't already been added to the page) for albums. I am not affiliated with the website.

Before adding all those links, as someone else did before, it would be best to get a consensus as to whether this is a notable site. MrMarmite (talk) 12:11, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anthem (Rush song)

Hi, next time instead of creating an article at an improperly disambiguated title such as you did with Anthem (Rush Song), just start editing and expand the redirected Anthem (Rush song). From what I can tell, you understand how disambiguated titles work. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:28, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppetry

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Danieleb82. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article recreate

this was already removed In ictu oculi (talk) 13:56, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

— Berean Hunter (talk) 17:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]