Jump to content

User talk:Butterbeanne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Rankersbo (talk) 11:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse logo
Hello! Butterbeanne, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Draft:Kunsthalle Detroit concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kunsthalle Detroit, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kunsthalle Detroit concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kunsthalle Detroit, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kunsthalle Detroit

[edit]

Hello, Butterbeanne. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Kunsthalle Detroit".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Kunsthalle Detroit}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:00, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Terminal cycle for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terminal cycle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terminal cycle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Non-Dropframe talk 11:55, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate articles were created erroneously. This article must be deleted as it is a duplicate of "Terminal Cycle" (with quotation marks included). Please delete THIS article bu not "Terminal Cycle" with quotation marks. Butterbeanne (talk) 12:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tim White-Sobieski, WHO ARE YOU neon project.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tim White-Sobieski, WHO ARE YOU neon project.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Andree Putman, Zaha Hadid, Tim White Sobieski, Marc Jacobs, Sylvie Fleury, Shigeru Ban and Bernard Arnault.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Andree Putman, Zaha Hadid, Tim White Sobieski, Marc Jacobs, Sylvie Fleury, Shigeru Ban and Bernard Arnault.jpg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Andree Putman, Zaha Hadid, Tim White Sobieski, Marc Jacobs, Sylvie Fleury, Shigeru Ban and Bernard Arnault.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 02:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kunsthalle Detroit (October 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:
A couple things: you need to meet the guideline WP:Notability (organizations) for this subject. Please read the guideline briefly, since what you have so far doesn't meet it at all.

What you must show is that outside, neutral, reputable experts have discussed this Kunsthalle Detroit and its impact and significance. We don't care at all what the KD has to say about itself, we care what other people have said about the KD.

Secondly, you need to remove all these links to outside websites. We aren't a linkfarm, you don't need to link some artist's website simply because you mention their name. If they have a Wikipedia article of their own, you can WP:Wikilink their name but that's it.

For how to add links to your Sources, please see WP:Referencing for beginners which tells the quick and easy way to format footnotes.

Please make these fixes and then click Resubmit.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tim White-Sobieski for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim White-Sobieski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim White-Sobieski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:51, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

I noticed that both of your new articles are up for deletion. Would you like some help? If you do, just write a message here, with @Jacqke at the beginning, and I should see it.Jacqke (talk) 10:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC) @Jacqke Thank you. I am taken aback by "nominations for deletion". What could be a problem?[reply]

Here's Wikipedia in a nutshell: people interested in making this encyclopedia reliable often do not communicate with new "editors" (I don't call myself that...I write more than I edit). It takes a lot less work to criticize someone's writing than to improve it. What should have happened is some messages at the top telling you that you need to add information (especially sources that speak to the info in the article). What happened is that an editor took the cheap route and decided to say that there are no good sources in existence for your topic, making it not "notable". The good news is that there are editors who can guide you through improving it, and once you understand what is wanted, you'll probably never have problems again. The most important thing to do right now is find sources such as books, news articles, magazines,art exhibits, museums that you can reference to show this artist is not someone just starting out, but is an established artist. Another thing to do right away is to frontload important details in the introduction...he's done x, y and z things, is important because of z.... Once you have some references, it is a matter of inserting them in the document, similarly to a school or academic paper. I can include some formatting if you need. Finally, after you make a change, put something about the change in the edit summary. You can type four ~ marks to sign comments you make on a talk page, like this Jacqke (talk) 16:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have a little time right now and am going to try to work some sources in as I find themJacqke (talk) 17:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I told you wrong. To get my attention, type Reply to|Jacqke with {{ }} around it. There is another user, Paulinapaulina3030 , interested in saving the article. Any any chance do you have books or magazines or something printed that had info on Mr White-Sobiesk or his art?Jacqke (talk) 18:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kunsthalle Detroit (October 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
I don't know what "dedicated to light art in contemporary art" means so that needs to be clarified. You cannot have "http" links within the text. Those can be in a section called "External links" or, if they have WP articles, you can make them wp:wikilinks. You cannot use blogs or social media sites (4square, eventbrite) as links, and not all HuffPost articles are acceptable -- depends on who wrote them (reputation, reliability)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 04:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kunsthalle Detroit concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kunsthalle Detroit, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kunsthalle Detroit

[edit]

Hello, Butterbeanne. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Kunsthalle Detroit".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:17, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kunsthalle Detroit has been accepted

[edit]
Kunsthalle Detroit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kpgjhpjm 01:34, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edits at New Russian Word

[edit]

This is a PR/SEO site that has hijacked the domain and easily tracable back to a black-hat mareketing firm that has used the site abusively on Wikipedia. Please do not add any more material to that article unless you have rock-solid sources. A press release from that same firm is obviously not, nor is any other junk PR source. If you are having difficultly determining the status of a reliable source, please ask. Sam Kuru (talk) 18:39, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no problem in stating the fact that the dormant business has been acquired by an alternate owner. The publication is striving to remain strong in digital format. The legal documents confirming the mentioned above acquisition are not required to be quoted in Wikipedia. Please stop your bullying behavior and do not reverse my edits. If not, I demand valid details to support your speculations. I am not aware of any black hat marketing, nor of a hijacked domain. Butterbeanne (talk) 02:15, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Butterbeanne&oldid=1170078245"