User talk:Busy Stubber

This user may have left Wikipedia. Busy Stubber has not edited Wikipedia since 29 January 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello, Busy Stubber! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! LittleOldMe 12:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

betacommand messages

Not that I'd know how to do. There are some really nifty scripts that some users have written, I'm sure there are users who would be happy to take on the task. How to enlist their help is the problem though.

Perhaps a message at the village pump in the Technical or Assistance section.

I hope I've been of some help. Regards LittleOldMe 14:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sock Puppet

Hi! I was quite disappointed with you accusing me of claiming to be the same person who disagreed on your removal of the links on Earned Value Management. To be honest, I felt really bad about it as these accusations are simply not true. I've seen the edit that you made (removing the external links) shortly after and I didn't quite approve of this edit. To be honest, I waited, out of respect to you, till more at least 2 other people agree that it wasn't a very accurate edit (for lack of better words). Anyways, I don't want to feel offended by my edit. To be honest, this is the first time I know what a sock puppet is, and I was amazed that you already know about this. Anyways, I think you know my point, and if you don't agree that this is a legitimate edit please express your opinion on the talk page of the article itself, no need to accuse someone of adding his own link (like you did on the talk page of the article to the other person) or accusing me of being a sock puppet. I'm just here because I'm interested in Project Management and not to start wars. I appreciate what you're doing and I know that you've done it in good faith, but put yourself in my shoes, wouldn't think that it's a bit offending to accuse someone of something that you most probably think it's not true (or, at the very least, you 're just assuming it's true). Pm master 04:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Coin Image

First if all, I put that in the image just so that it would look like a face when scaled down. How often do people see it in high resolution, other than if they look at the page of the icon itself? At the size it is normally seen, it is hard to tell its a dog. Look at other icon images, you'll see they do similar things. aido2002^talk 04:27, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that seems like a much more logical issue to bring up. :) Anyway, while I understand your concern, I have to say I respectfully disagree with you, since the image is such a basic thing, being only used on a stub template, and not even often called attention to. Plus, I think that just because it happens to parody a U.S. coin doesn't mean that we shouldn't use it, because there really is no "generic" coin. I'm going to revert the template back, but if you can find a few others who agree with you, I'll be more than happy to edit the image. aido2002^talk 18:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know if I am doing this right... :)

I wasn't sure how to reply back to your message, so I hope this is right. :)

I read the book as a project one of my management classes (getting my master's...ugh!). Should I not have edited those mentioned articles? If not, I can delete them...it's not a big deal to me! :)

Have a great day! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdc545 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I answered on your talk page :). --Busy Stubber 19:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same here, not sure how to do this. I was adding links to inform about internal company organizations. It is no more promotion than the company article itself. It is not spam. I am an employee of the company in question and I merely wanted to offer more information about an important part of our company.--GUIB Corrector 06:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Academic disciplines

I am not aware of any guidelines focusing on articles about academic disciplines. WP:NOT#DIR and WP:NOT#INFO might be relevant as general guidelines, though subject to interpretation.--Palaeovia^talk 01:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The disciplines in List of academic disciplines seem to be mixed as far as having lists of schools or departments in the articles. Mathematical physics has no list of schools, Native American studies does. Silviculture and Interlinguistics don't, Industrial relations does. It would be helpful to have something covering this in Category:Wikipedia content guidelines, I think. Just an idea. Once a general list of schools or departments gets started in one of these articles, it's not clear where WP:NOT#DIR kicks in. --Busy Stubber 14:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Atmosphere International (trade Show)

The anons are back to remove the tags I placed on this article. I've tagged it for speedy deletion, but I'm not going to keep following this page much longer. I've got more fun things to do in wikiland. Regards—G716 <^T·_C> 03:14, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help -- I was losing the ability to assume good faith there! --Busy Stubber 23:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Interac (Japan)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Interac (Japan), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interac (Japan). Thank you. J 03:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just read your input on Interac on the Talk page. Very interesting stuff. I think it really does belong on the article page. Can you sum that up and put it in the article?DDD DDD (talk) 04:42, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disposable/Discretionary income

Well hello there, busy stubber! I'd give you the wiki finger, but I don't know if you've got the warped sense of humor so many others around here seem to have. So I'll settle for: thank you for your feedback. I did not provide an external reference since the point I was making was verified in the text itself. But perhaps there is a flaw in my math, logic, or communication skills... or perhaps more than one of the above. Anyway, I though perhaps that would be acceptable. I refrained from pointing out that a tiered DTI is sometimes used to solve the same problem since that, I think, would require an external source and I was feeling too lazy to cast about for one. I suppose that's a character flaw (since we're talking about me <ha ha>). Anyway, I suppose it will be some work to find since most folks who write are approximately as lazy as I am and stop with defining the ratio and saying something obvious like, lower is better, or keep it under 30 (or whatever number they like or think is in vogue). But as it is a ratio, if I make over $1,000,000 per year, even at 60%, I still have a lot of discretionary income left over, so I probably can pay for that Jeep Cherokee... but if I'm making 28K/yr, I probably will get debt counseling, but not the loan if my DTI is 60%, because my discretionary income is in serious trouble, even if I'm living with Mom... that's why I say, it's a math thing.--Pearrari (talk) 03:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rich Ball

An article that you have been involved in editing, Rich Ball, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Ball. Thank you. Susiequesie (talk) 03:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please knock it off

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on User talk:SilyOlPooh. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. I assume you believe all pages on Wikipedia are a matter of record, however that is not the case of User pages. A user may clear his own Talk page per Wikipedia policy, as listed at User Talk Pages —Preceding unsigned comment added by SilyOlPooh (talk • contribs) 06:22, 16 January 2008

Citations

Thanks for the tips on formatting citations. I've been using a hacked together method for some time, I was SO engrossed in writing the article that I left the formatting to those formatting junkies that love to fix HTML and Wiki tags. -- Emana (Talk) 18:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Netpay

You should feel free to try to write an article about the various types of web payments out there. Or, perhaps, there's a good redirect for Netpay...? — Scientizzle 00:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what to do about this. I'm worried that readers and editors will see "netpay" variations on the internet and look to wiki to figure it all out. Redirect or disambig -- I don't know what's best. Can you help? I'll add what I can, but I do basic stuff okay but not detail sourcing. My edits would be brief -- maybe a source or two. Nothing to really expand the article, just quickly check it. I'm not very good at formulating feature articles, just plugging away at trying to help start-up articles --Busy Stubber (talk) 01:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll help as much as I can. — Scientizzle 01:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Continued User Talk Pages edit violation

January 2008

Wednesday, January 23

Re: User talk:SilyOlPooh

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:SilyOlPooh, you will be blocked from editing. Users may clear their own User talk pages per Wikipedia policy. That is an official Wikipedia policy. Please discontinue your violative behavior in reverting my Talk page, in clear disregard for that policy. If you continue, I will have to recommend your account for a block. So just leave it alone, okay? Thank you. --SilyOlPooh (talk) 08:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see also Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments. --SilyOlPooh (talk) 09:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this information. --Busy Stubber (talk) 02

06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Good luck, Wikipedia

I'm taking a break from Wikipedia under this username. One of my computers crashed with a virus earlier tonight after I logged on. My backup computer might be okay or might not be. Working under a Wikipedia logon name doesn't seem good for computer health. The Mafia comes to mind.

Did the best I could under this logon -- sorry for my mistakes, and good luck to future editors. --Busy Stubber (talk) 02:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ITC Holding Company for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ITC Holding Company, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITC Holding Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]