User talk:Buster7/Archives/2011/May
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Buster7. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 2 May 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief
Amy Jung's account
Hey Ed- My account is cuppa67. I really like the 2 links you added... gerber and snopes. Let me know what to do from here. Thanks- Amy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cuppa67 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
DHS research question
The link I just added to Dorothy Hope Smith (DHS), it is a site where I have to pay for membership to access the entire biography. Can that be used as a reference if people can't get to it? I am gonna pay for 24 hour access to get the bio information out of curiosity. But can I use it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cuppa67 (talk • contribs) 18:57, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
gerber pix removal
I am dying to know if we can use a newspaper article and/or a site that I purchased information from as a reference. I don't think getting the gerber baby picture removed because it is a non-free item is the same. If I wanted permission to use it, who would I contact? That makes me wonder if I need permission to post a picture of Dorothy or her work. Whom would I get permission from? A family member? Which wouldn't be a problem for me to get. How would I prove permission to Wiki to not have it removed? Did I get you in too deep with this one?--Cuppa67 (talk) 13:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Our friend Alastair
Hi B7. It's been a year, so our friend Alastair can contact ArbCom and be unblocked. Have you been able to contact Alastair? TRA! - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 13:39, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 May 2011
- In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news
- WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games
- Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back
- Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?
The Signpost: 16 May 2011
- WikiProject report: Back to Life: Reviving WikiProjects
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motions - hyphens and dashes dispute
- Technology report: Berlin Hackathon; April Engineering Report; brief news
The Signpost: 23 May 2011
- News and notes: GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news
- In the news: Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Formula One
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 30 May 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom referendum goes live; US National Archives residency; financial planning; brief news
- In the news: Collaboration with academia; world heritage; xkcd; eG8 summit; ISP subpoena; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Royal Railway
- Featured content: Whipping fantasies, American–British naval rivalry, and a medieval mix of purity and eroticism
- Arbitration report: Update – injunction from last week has expired
- Technology report: Wikimedia down for an hour; What is: Wikipedia Offline?