User talk:Bussfiu

I knew you were a worthless liar

What happened to the things you said here? Are you so psychotic or is your life so worthless that you don't have anything better to do that spam your fan pics? Ian.thomson (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just started wikipedia, that's the thing.

Bull, you're engaging in the exact same vandalism as David Beals. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you just want to keep harassing me? I was telling users to help improve an article on wikia I found. The restaurant wikia actually need more pages and it seems to be abandoned. Bussfiu (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you really weren't Beals (which I doubt, seeing how you first approached a user that Beals regularly harassed), Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikia, and Wikipedia is not the place to spam Wikia sites or recruit anyone for Wikia sites. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I found that user when I looked to see if Mike Rosoft exists here (he is the one who created a page in Restaruant Wikia). Go ahead, keep harassing me. Bussfiu (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Mike Croscft" is clearly a sock account. You're either buying into a troll's actions or you're the troll yourself. Either way, you've been reported:

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is David Beals again. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:38, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't notice the c instead of o. Harass me all you want, and you'll end up being blocked.Bussfiu (talk) 17:40, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 17:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bussfiu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was putting a flag so someone can improve wikia, but someone kept harassing me.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- GB fan 18:10, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.