User talk:BusriderSF2015

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

or

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

There's a report at ANI about you.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is BusriderSF2015. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:37, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 02:32, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BusriderSF2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I repeatedly said each contributor has right freely oppose their suggest edits and users who reported me never ever used my talk page to address those specific concern they just unfairly expiated the reported into a ANI case. * Speedy Deletion on few of my Copyright was inappropriate, the user made hard for users to contest the deletion. Not allowing them appeal until the photos are deleted. * Edits i made was correctly following the guidelines... * Language discrimination is irreverent and should not included in the case. (100% sure millions of Wikipedia editors has English as 2nd language. "Saying I'm guessing English isn't your first language?" then blocking users is incompetent. 🥇BUSriderSFUser (talk • contribs) 02:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Really? This talk page is filled with concerns about your editing, and you have obviously dismissed them repeatedly ([1][2]). English does not have to be your first language, but if you are unable to write a coherent sentence in English, I am afraid you should not be editing the English Wikipedia at all. This block will remain in place unless if you can address the reasons for this block and the concerns behind them. Alex Shih (talk) 02:50, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BusriderSF2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Only few users did about other questions, but the people who reported me did not...only gave prebuild response..what those mean.. "Saying I'm guessing English isn't your first language?" then blocking users is incompetent and that remark should not even be in the case. This blocked status should never been placed based on anger.🥇BUSriderSFUser (talk • contribs) 10:54 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. One more appeal complaining about other editors instead of focusing on how you are going to change the way you edit and I will remove your talk page access. NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:12, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Part 2 Ban Appeals

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BusriderSF2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How am i going change? (I am going make this simple)

Addressing issues as i been changing rapidly. (no one can be perfect, but at least can do the best to be excellent contributor (Mistakes can happen anytime as seen it for more than 10 years being here (Before i lost my account)) 🥇BUSriderSFUser (talk • contribs)

Decline reason:

Apart from the obvious untruth already highlighted in your copyright violation, you clearly do not possess sufficient competence in the English language to enable you to edit here. And it is a requirement that editors should possess adequate linguistic competence. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:18, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BusriderSF2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Apart from the obvious untruth already highlighted in your copyright violation, you clearly do not possess sufficient competence in the English language to enable you to edit here. And it is a requirement that editors should possess adequate linguistic competence. English is my First Language, but not possible to have perfect English. Wanted me to post very basic and simple sentences (that`s easy i can do that below) I am complying with the Customs/Blocking Policy. *I Been Addressing issues. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mike_Jackson_(fighter)&oldid=835656540 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/BusriderSF2015&offset=20180409232507&target=BusriderSF2015 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_San_Francisco_Municipal_Railway_lines&oldid=662087175 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_San_Francisco_Municipal_Railway_lines&oldid=680749837 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_San_Francisco_Municipal_Railway_lines&oldid=686389792 ...etc *I am Contributor, but mistakes can happen. *Copyright details being addressed. *Edit Preview : I use Visual Editor (I am Beta Tester) *Challenging Rules : I read the rule carefully. I focus on Some Parts of UFC related Wikipedia Pages, WWE Related Wikipedia Pages, Cities Wikipedia Pages, City Transportation Wikipedia Pages,Security Vulnerability Wikipedia pages, and Computer Processors Wikipedia Pages. I considered myself a Legacy Wikipedia Contributor, and I plan to go back changing local cities Wikipedia for few more edits after that go into Semi-Retired or Retired Status after appeals. Cheers 🥇BUSriderSFUser (talk • contribs) 20:11, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Both your posts on this page relating to your block and your editing elsewhere show that: (1) You can't compose a coherent sentence in English, which is a necessary requirement for editing an English language encyclopaedia. (Whether the cause of that problem is that English is not your first language or something else is irrelevant.) (2) You very often can't understand what other editors are saying to you, which is a necessary requirement for contributing to a collaborative project. (3) You either can't or won't agree to comply with Wikipedia policies. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BusriderSF2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

severe problems with editing/English competency, copyright problems on Commons with images used on enwiki

I been addressing issues and willing kindly address more issues.
My English can improve easily, but i will change it to make it simpler for others to understand to meet Wikipedia Requirements. (coherent or what other issue to be resolved)
Rules are being followed and i will follow more
If there a suggestion for a rule. I will use that Wikipedia talk page to place my voice.

I acknowledged the improvement required to get a unblocker. What Else? 🥇BUSriderSFUser (talk • contribs) 21:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Further to previous comments made to you; even using a generous latitude in assessment, this unblock request, which should be well within the grasp of any editor competent in /English, contains seven errors of grammar or syntax. Competence is clearly not demonstrated. Unless any future unblock request is written in at least passable English I will revoke your access to this page.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BusriderSF2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am here to make a Unblock request in Good Faith.

I am following the WP:COMPETENCE concerns.

There is also the problem of editors whose command of English is sufficient for colloquial use, and who can make themselves understood on talk pages and in other informal circumstances, but who do not write sufficiently well in English that their contributions to articles are acceptable. These editors could also be encouraged to edit the Wikipedia of their native language or other languages they are more conversant with, and to limit their contributions on English Wikipedia articles to edits that do not require writing in English or to work with native speakers to improve their contributions.

I am here to point out a rule. I will limit edits since i going Semi-Retired or Retired. BusriderSF2015 23:24, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is the sixth attempt within a few hours to write an unblock request in passable English that addresses the reasons for the block. It still is insufficient: It contradicts your previous statements regarding the kinds of edits you're interested in. It doesn't address the copyright issues. The English still contains many errors. This clearly is going nowhere. With multiple warnings above, I have revoked talk page access. WP:UTRS is still available. Huon (talk) 23:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy Account Issue and Other Plans

- How did you lose your account? I am quite inclined to consider that it was blocked.....~ Winged Blades^Godric 04:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was not blocked, i think forgot my password and email or there was some security breach or something...so i just went create new one (but that many many years ago). Before this Block i was about go back to editing Local Wikipedia Page..then go into Semi-Retired Status. 🥇BUSriderSFUser (talk • contribs) 05:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Many editors edit with English as a second or third language, but they are expected to exhibit sufficient competency in English to edit without the grievous errors that have been on display here and at ANI. I asked because it was apparent that the offensiveness of your initial reaction at ANI might not have been apparent to you, and frankly, if English was your first language, it would be understood as deliberately offensive. I blocked you after reading through your edit history and found that you lack the necessary competency in English to even recognize your errors, much less contribute appropriately. Beyond that, you have consistently ignored the concerns of other editors, and you've been uploading copyright violations and passing them off as your own. One of those three things might be fixable, but not all three. What was your previous account name? Acroterion (talk) 11:51, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think i created around 2003-2005, idk what happen i was inactive for around 3 months (around 10 years ago) - suddenly i cant login and used recovery options (nothing). I don`t remember long name, what matter is gone. 20:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)🥇BUSriderSFUser (talk • contribs)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

BusriderSF2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21169 was submitted on Apr 11, 2018 00:23:14. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

BusriderSF2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21184 was submitted on Apr 11, 2018 20:06:24. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:06, 11 April 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

BusriderSF2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21186 was submitted on Apr 11, 2018 21:46:44. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Jackson (fighter) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Jackson (fighter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Jackson (fighter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:47, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BusriderSF2015. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Sro23 (talk) 21:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mike Jackson (fighter)

Hello, BusriderSF2015. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mike Jackson (fighter), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mike Jackson (fighter)

Hello, BusriderSF2015. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mike Jackson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:35, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]