User talk:Bushin2016

Crist's Party

I know that, technically, this edit of yours is correct. However, what does "Independent" mean? Independent is not a party, it is used to refer to someone who has no party affiliation, which is what Crist is right now (and will be as long as he believes it helps him). Your edit seems to introduce an awkward redlink without really improving anything. I'm not reverting right now, but I'd like to hear your reply. 98.82.34.167 (talk) 18:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This website, provided by TIME Magazine, clearly states that Charlie Crist is in fact a Republican, although he is presently not running as either party. To say that his Republican Party affiliation status ended in 2010 is incorrect. We could create a hyperlink on "No Party Affiliation", telling readers what it means. It's important to emphasize though that Crist is still a Republican.

Wow, I hadn't seen that anywhere else. So yes, you are correct in your edit. But some type of explanation is needed, as you indicate, because I'm sure other persons will not understand any better than I did. I suggest you start a section at Talk:Charlie Crist, staking out your position and asking others for their suggestions on how to handle this. I'll look for your post, and of course, barring more persuasive arguments, I'll be in your corner. 98.82.34.167 (talk) 18:19, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You could start it just by pasting this entire exchange between us to Talk:Charlie Crist. 98.82.34.167 (talk) 18:20, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moi

By the way, I am not "a Wikipedia staff member". 98.82.34.167 (talk) 17:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Rick Scott. Thank you.--Cúchullain ^t/c 13:14, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lady Gaga. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Chelsea Manning, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. —me_and 16:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]