User talk:Burning Sands
== 0
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 17:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Re: Seiden Wayne
[edit]The key thing for writing articles about people or companies is to be able to assert notability through the use of reliable sources. While there are no codified rules for determining the notability of law firms, generally the firms has to have been the recipient of at least two instances of non-trivial coverage from reliable, independent sources and have a specific claim to notability, such as arguing a precedent-setting case in the SCOTUS, defending a client in a landmark criminal trial, winning important awards, etc...
Also, before submitting the article for inclusion in the encyclopedia, make sure it is as complete as possible. If you can't finish it all at once, then you may wish to work on a draft article outside what is termed here as the "mainspace". This is most commonly achieved by drafting it in your userspace, such as at User:Burning Sands/Seiden Wayne. When the article is complete, you can use the "move" feature (see the above tabs) to move it to Seiden Wayne.
Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Caknuck 17:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
THANK YOU for that clarification. I will respond on your usertalk.
Burning Sands 17:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- The articles you posted were promotional in nature. They also included other people's text, which is copyright infringement. Please don't do that. -- But|seriously|folks 17:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- It is not enough to identify the source from which text was copied. It's still a copyright violation. Do not copy and paste other people's text to Wikipedia. Also, it is difficult to conceive of a sentence like "Over 100 years after its inception, the firm has emerged as a leader in several of its litigational and transactional practice areas in response to the increasing demands and complexity of its clients' needs." as being anything other than promotional in nature. Please do not post promotion material to Wikipedia. Thank you. -- But|seriously|folks 18:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- The answer is yes, the pages can be reposted. Speedy deletion is without prejudice to recreation of the articles in such a way that addresses the reason for deletion. So you can create it again, but don't copy other people's text and don't include promotional language. Also, if you have any connection to these firms, you should not be creating or editing their articles per WP:COI. As to the promotional language you found in other articles, the fact that other material exists that may violate polices does not mean that it is ok for everybody to do so. Feel free to remove promotional language from any article you come across. Thanks! -- But|seriously|folks 19:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, I'd be happy to take a look at it for you. -- But|seriously|folks 20:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- The answer is yes, the pages can be reposted. Speedy deletion is without prejudice to recreation of the articles in such a way that addresses the reason for deletion. So you can create it again, but don't copy other people's text and don't include promotional language. Also, if you have any connection to these firms, you should not be creating or editing their articles per WP:COI. As to the promotional language you found in other articles, the fact that other material exists that may violate polices does not mean that it is ok for everybody to do so. Feel free to remove promotional language from any article you come across. Thanks! -- But|seriously|folks 19:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- It is not enough to identify the source from which text was copied. It's still a copyright violation. Do not copy and paste other people's text to Wikipedia. Also, it is difficult to conceive of a sentence like "Over 100 years after its inception, the firm has emerged as a leader in several of its litigational and transactional practice areas in response to the increasing demands and complexity of its clients' needs." as being anything other than promotional in nature. Please do not post promotion material to Wikipedia. Thank you. -- But|seriously|folks 18:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Much better! Thanks! -- But|seriously|folks 05:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Rutgers Law Review Book Small.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rutgers Law Review Book Small.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:29, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
