User talk:Burgwerworldz

I have removed the merge tag from Thunder Bay Northern Hawks

Consensus has been reached. The only person post-AfD who wants a merge is Rob. It's gone on for five days, and the AfD was another five days previous. The matter is closed. If you feel that this is a horrible miscarriage of justice, go ahead and file an RFC. It's time to move on. I'm posting this to associated users' talk pages as well. you know, this has really torpedoed my wikibreak RasputinAXP c 15:59, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus was not reached. The ice hockey boys are forcing a decision and restricting opening up the debate. Robertsteadman 16:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

El Paso

Are you from El Paso, Texas? Somnabot 23:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WrestleMania X8

Could you please help summarize this [1]? I keep telling him it's full of grammar errors, weasel words, and peacock terms, yet he still keeps adding it. If you could help me summarize the match to be consistent with other matches in the article I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you.--3bulletproof16 21:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TheTruth2 has been reported. If you would like to leave a comment concerning the situation please do so here. I find it strange that when he is referred to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling show formatting or any other guideline for that matter, he claims that he has already read them and that his edits "still follows the guidelines". Signed up just 3 days ago... Yep TJ Spyke and I are dealing with a troll here.--3bulletproof16 22:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

White space edits

Hi. A quick suggestion - you might want to mark your "ws" whitespace-only edits as minor per Help:Minor edit. Thanks. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:11, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

North Springs High School

You deleted a lot of information on the North Springs High School page. I am not sure I agree that it should have been deleted. I restored the page to the previous post. I think a lot of it is probably pretty useful to some people. Maybe we can reorganize the page to make it smaller and more concise? Earlopogous 13:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

I am going to revert the North Springs High School page, but leave the tag. I find it very weird that you did not respond to my earlier post before reverting the edit. SAT scores are very important to some people and I do not understand why they should not be included in the article. Activities are also an important part of the schools page. Look at the structual guidelines on the WikiProject Schools page. I agree that the article may read like an advertisement. Some of the information was lifted from the North Springs website. Please, let's talk about this on the North Springs High School talk page. I would be happy to work with you to fix the writing of the page. Earlopogous 22:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

I have removed the advert tag. There have been several changes and improvements by various authors in the 8 months since the tag was added. The article is reasonably written and is similar in content, format and notability as other high school articles in Wikipedia. If you disagree with this assessment, please feel free to revert the tag. If you do that, it would be helpful if you could describe in the discussion area what changes you would like to see so that it does not appear to be an advertisement. Truthanado 18:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vic Grimes

I just can't get through to user JB196. He continues to revert the article, reducing its quality claiming that he is not credited as "The Author" in the article itself. The issue is being brought up here [2] help would be greatly appreciated. -- bulletproof ^3:16 04:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Student Organizations

I did a revert at U of Tennessee-Martin, but then I saw that you were doing it elsewhere. There are several of the best written of the University articles that do include student organizations. University of California, Berkeley and University of Chicago for starters. Some Universities pages have their student organizations split into separate pages, such as Carnegie-Mellon University. I would think that doing a CFD on a page such as Carnegie_Mellon_University_student_organizations would help show whether or not it is the general opinion of Wikipedians that student organizations represent cruft. Naraht 15:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Students for Economic Justice

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Students for Economic Justice. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]