User talk:Burger2227
May 2015
[edit]
Hello, I'm PhantomTech. I noticed that you made a change to an article, George Stephanopoulos, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PHANTOMTECH (talk) 18:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
[edit]It looks like you are engaging in an edit war concerning the George Stephanopoulos article. You keep changing the name of the section concerning his donations to Clinton and adding the word "charity" and you are doing this without discussion or providing any type of reliable source for your edit. I have provided a reliable source for your edit. You can review my reliable source here: CNN: Stephanopoulos seeks to move past Clinton donations scandal. I would encourage you to revert your latest edit to avoid a block.--ML (talk) 20:38, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--ML (talk) 20:41, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Your reverts are as follows: (1) revert #1 (2) revert #2--ML (talk) 20:45, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
So I can find a quote from another news source to change the topic name from SCANDAL? Where is the reference to that? The CNN link?
"George Stephanopoulos discloses $75,000 contribution to Clinton Foundation"
"George Stephanopoulos Acknowledges Giving Money to Clinton Foundation"
"Stephanopoulos’s Gifts to Clinton Foundation Reinforce G.O.P. Doubts"
Are not preferred over this reference AFTER them? All 3 use "Clinton Foundation" rather than just Clinton donation scandal? :
He agreed to drop out as a moderator of the scheduled February 2016 Republican Presidential primary debate.[31]
I wouldn't mind some help from up top here so I don't have to! Burger2227 (talk) 22:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Burger2227, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
|
Hi Burger2227!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |