Jump to content

User talk:Bull84

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blocked

[edit]

I've blocked this user as a sock puppet of User:Rick lay95, which would appear to have been set up to get round the block placed on Rick lay95's account.

Like User:Rick lay95, this user only makes edits which relate to Power Rangers and Mid Continental Football League teams.

Oh, and User:Rick lay95 has played in position 84 for the Louiseville Bulls.

CLW 14:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I don't get this. I dropped the rick_lay name and decided on another name to start over. I have't done anything wrong on this name and yet I am blocked once again? What kind of website is being run here?

You know you were blocked, and you know why you were blocked. So don't you think it's kind of obvious that setting up a sock puppet account to get around the block will get you blocked again? CLW 08:36, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


As I said, I abondoned the rick_lay name. Check it out, I don't even remember the last time I even used it. All I have been doing here is working on the MCFL pages (since no one else does) and cleaning up some Power Ranger pages. As I have said, I have done nothing wrong. So what am I suppose to do now? It seems that I can't us either rick_lay95 or Bul84. All I can see now it to make another name if neither of these accounts come back to me. Especially since I have done nothing wrong as Bull84

Knock it off with the claim of "I haven't done anything wrong as Bull84". Yes you blatantly have. You've used it to get around a block that was placed on one of your other accounts. If you're blocked for constantly disregarding rules and proceedures, you can't then just set up another account to keep on editing despite the block. CLW 11:38, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


So basicaly your telling me I can never edit on wikipedia again. Since you havn't lifted the ban on rick_lay95 and now you are banning my Bull84. So whats the point?

No, that's not what I'm saying at all. You were given a month's block for your constant refusal to play by the rules. And what did you do? You set up another account to evade the block. So you've been blocked again for that. If you're given a month's block, you need to ride it out. So that month's block needs to start again from when this block was put in place (24 March). If after 24 April you wish to edit again and play by the rules, you're then welcome to make an unblock request here. If you set up more sock puppet accounts in the meantime, you'll be blocked again. Possibly for longer than a month this time. CLW 11:29, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well this is very unconvient for me. I have been set up by the MCFL's vice president to make these pages on this site. If I tell him that I am not able to do them anymore, all he is going to do is set me up an accout with his info and have me edit for him. One way or another I will edit for the league. I need to for that matter. And you can't block everyone who wants to edit the MCFL pages.

I can only assume that you're willfully misunderstanding the whole situation, as I would imagine that you're not stupid. I'm not trying to stop people from editing the MCFL pages. This is about your repeated refusal to respect copyright law and Wikipedia guidelines, and the fact that when you're blocked for this you set up sock puppet accounts, leading to your blocks being extended. If you'd like to e-mail me the contact details of the MCFL's vice president, I'll happily contact him and explain why you're unable to edit at the moment. Regards, CLW 10:34, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MCFL2.GIF

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MCFL2.GIF. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 03:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DetroitSeminoles2.gif)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:DetroitSeminoles2.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bombers helmet rightface.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bombers helmet rightface.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]