User talk:Buhay Tao

Hello, Buhay Tao! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Tikiwont (talk) 19:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Allowing username change to Buhay Tao (talk · contribs). Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking.

Request handled by: Daniel Case (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

MfD nomination of User:ᜊᜓᜑᜌ᜔ ᜆᜂ

User:ᜊᜓᜑᜌ᜔ ᜆᜂ, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ᜊᜓᜑᜌ᜔ ᜆᜂ and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:ᜊᜓᜑᜌ᜔ ᜆᜂ during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JL 09 ^_{q?_c} 12:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted this as your previous username was User:ᜊᜓᜑᜌ᜔ᜆ᜖. User:Buhay Tao is the place where you can now write something about yourself. I'll also add a welcome message with links above. Happy editing once again!--Tikiwont (talk) 19:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but my first username was in fact a typo. Sorry.--Buhay Tao (talk) 03:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of "discussion"

at Talk:Philippine presidential election, 2010. –Howard the Duck 19:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pleading you to join the discussion there before reverting edits. Reverting each other is not helpful and eh... "my" edit has the support of one person there. –Howard the Duck 02:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citing Wikipedia

Please note that Wikipedia should not be used as a source within Wikipedia articles. kazu (talk) 15:12, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm using the series that aired in 2005 as the source, not the articles. Philippine shows have no episodes per se so it would be difficult to cite them.--[[User:Buhay Tao|Buhay Tao (ᜊᜓᜑᜌ᜔ ᜆᜂ)]] ([[User talk:Buhay Tao|Buhay Tao (ᜊᜓᜑᜌ᜔ ᜆᜂ)]]) (talk) 15:14, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 08:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

As confirmed by CheckUser. –MuZemike 08:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Buhay Tao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is unjustified. I did not vandalise any pages, in fact I improved many of them. Just see my contributions. No vandalism, almost no controversial edits. This is a clear act of discrimination against people with with Pro-Third World beliefs. Censorship!!! I believe that this is why some policies of Wikipedia are rotten, they do not discern with a case to case basis, therefore they have an inability to determine whether a User is truly pruductive or not.

Decline reason:

Your request does not address the reason for your block, which is the inappropriate use of multiple accounts. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:25, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that if other editors can tell that you have "pro-third world beliefs," you probably are not following the neutral point of view policy. And if you are following the neutral point of view policy, other editors won't know what your beliefs are, and thus won't be able to discriminate against you based on them. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:26, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Buhay Tao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Then I would try to follow that policy, the neutral point of view policy, in spite of my beliefs. As you can see, my recent edits are nothing but neutral so I suggest that you rethink this block. I feel that I have been wrongfully targeted by people like JL 09 and Elockid, both of whom appear to have a vendetta against me and both appear to be working in tandem. I do not wish to disrupt Wikipedia, and I have proven that in my recent edits. I think you should rethink my block as well as the guidelines for blocking due to WP:Edit warring.

Decline reason:

Checkuser-confirmed sock of a banned user--who is also socking as Reincarnata, via a proxy. Talk page disabled. Blueboy 96 22:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I just declined unblock requests from you on two other accounts. Are you just requesting unblocks on all of them? I don't think you're going to find anyone to unblock multiple accounts of a banned user. Should I lock the talk pages for them as I decline them, just to make it simpler? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bagong Alyansang Makabayan/meta/shortname

Template:Bagong Alyansang Makabayan/meta/shortname has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 03:13, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]