User talk:Budders6

June 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

I know you're the long-term IP F1 vandal, so you might as well just stop what you're doing. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Changes

I've got all the time in the world to instantly revert your changes so there really is no point with all this 'vandalism'. BosleyTree (talk) 08:25, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually there are several of us on the case. There's so much constructive stuff you could be doing around here, just in the F1 and motor racing field. There are F1 fans all over the world so we've got 24/7 cover as well. Just don't bother. Honestly. Britmax (talk) 08:47, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2012 Formula One season, you may be blocked from editing. --SubSeven (talk) 21:25, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for inappropriate reasons is not allowed. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 03:26, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Budders6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To the administrators at Wikipedia. Budders6 my 11 year old brother with severe autism spectrum disorder (low functioning). As you may know, people with autism often have exceptional skills in certain areas, sometimes to the point of obsession: in this case, they are computers and Formula 1. He joined Wikipedia with my father's and we did our utmost to ascertain that he understood the terms and policies of Wikipedia before he signed up. He normally has great difficulty in expressing his feelings, but has told me that the above comments on his page have upset him greatly, even using the word 'distraught' to describe it. He has great knowledge of Formula One and knows no other way to express his love than to share it with the world than through Wikipedia. He simply doesn't understand vandalism is, and is a great F1 fans as well as those who read and edit these articles. We ask you to please keep the block on his account, but i we appeal to your better nature to please refrain from placing any more comments on the page. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reply to above

Sorry, mate, but if he's that upset by the remarks made above the only remedy is to keep him away from here. Those remarks are really mild compared to the reaction of some people and we have no way of stopping him from seeing them, try as we might. Like a few people round here when they ask for things, you are asking us to use powers we do not have, and which may not even exist. Britmax (talk) 10:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And although the above definition of low-functioning autism is not accurate, I am going to AGF and have locked this talkpage from non-administrators. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]