User talk:BuckyWinterWhiteWolfSoldier

Welcome!

Hello, Disneyisatale, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Maleficent (film), have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can place {{helpme}} on your talk page along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Chamith (talk) 14:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maleficent cost only $180 milion and Pirates 4 cost only $250 milion Jackson 96 (talk) 17:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Oz the Great and Powerful without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 02:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Maxresdefau.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Maxresdefau.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Seven wonders logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Seven wonders logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Good Dinosaur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 04:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Cars 3 D23 Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cars 3 D23 Poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Tinker-bell-and-the-legend-of-the-neverbeast-2014-03.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tinker-bell-and-the-legend-of-the-neverbeast-2014-03.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cars 3 D23 Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cars 3 D23 Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Zootopia. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Your statement that it is Disney's fourth highest-grossing film is directly contradicted by the previous sentence of the article, that it is "the third consecutive Walt Disney animated film to reach [$500 million gross]". McGeddon (talk) 10:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Finding Dory, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 09:49, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cars 3 D23 Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cars 3 D23 Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Disneyisatale. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not insert inaccurate information into Wikipedia

Your recent edit to Moana (2016 film) has been reverted as a violation of Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies. Thank you for your cooperation. --Coolcaesar (talk) 05:54, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please review the policies cited and review the discussion on the article's talk page. If you continue to engage in disruptive edits to the article Moana (2016 film), your editing privileges may be temporarily or permanently blocked. Thank you for your cooperation. --Coolcaesar (talk) 15:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Third warning for disruptive editing. Please review the policies cited, and review the discussion on the article's talk page. Inserting false information into Wikipedia not supported (and in fact refuted) by the sources cited is a violation of Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research. --Coolcaesar (talk) 19:35, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth warning for disruptive editing. at this edit on 21 January 2017. Please review Wikipedia:Verifiability, especially the section on self-published sources. If you continue to engage in disruptive edits to the article Moana (2016 film), your editing privileges may be temporarily or permanently blocked. Thank you for your cooperation. --Coolcaesar (talk) 04:38, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fifth warning for disruptive editing for this edit on 21 January 2017 in which you deleted information properly sourced to reliable sources and added inaccurate information cited to unreliable sources or to sources that do not support them.

Please respond to the ongoing discussion on the article's talk page and explain your justification for your edits. In the meantime, I am reverting your edits immediately as possible vandalism.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, your editing privileges may be temporarily or permanently blocked. Thank you for your cooperation. --Coolcaesar (talk) 22:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series)#Requested move 7 April 2017. Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 01:29, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. As has been stated, the low end of projected gross does not need to be stated as the film surpassed it, only that some projections had it making more than what it did. "upwards" does not indicate the film was a disappointment. Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:15, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Stranger things poster.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Stranger things poster.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Stranger things poster.png

Thanks for uploading File:Stranger things poster.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Stranger Things (season 1) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

Your edits to split to a separate article have been reverted. Please take it to the talk page and start a discussion, per the bold-revert-discuss cycle and allow the status quo to remain while you gain consensus to split. Your methods of hiding the summaries by removing them and keeping a duplicated table instead of transclusion were also incorrect and faulty. -- Alex^TW 10:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Disneyisatale. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded rating updates

There's no requirement to update the rottentomatoes.com rating info each day (or multiple times in a day) in Wikipedia articles as you have done at Star Wars sequel trilogy. If you're going to do update to ratings, try to update the accessed date (|accessdate or |access-date field) in the references too. Thanks, -Finlayson (talk) 20:09, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:BlackPantherLApremiereChadwickBoseman.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BlackPantherLApremiereChadwickBoseman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 12:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The image is taken from this article: [1]. I don't know how to specify the copyright status of the image. Disneyisatale (talk) 13:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BlackPantherLApremiereChadwickBoseman.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:BlackPantherLApremiereChadwickBoseman.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars 7 budget

Star Wars 7 cost $567 milion. This was reveled by Forbes in the article of Star Wars is a billion dollar blockbuster for Britain by Christian Sylt in early 2018. So please change the budget. Pietro Aversa (talk) 16:26, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Westworld (TV series) into Draft:Westworld (season 1). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Westworld season 1 the maze dvd cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Westworld season 1 the maze dvd cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BuckyWinterWhiteWolfSoldier. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your user name

Hi, I just want to say I think your username is awesome. That is all.★Trekker (talk) 18:27, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]