User talk:Buckeye1971

Buckeye1971, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Buckeye1971! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
12	Niyaz Ahmed (talk)	Add sources
36,430	Roman Polanski (talk)	Add sources
9	Lielais Kristaps (talk)	Add sources
74	Wazirabad (talk)	Add sources
1,044	Thermal expansion (talk)	Add sources
2	Constituency PP-24 (Jhelum-I) (talk)	Add sources
3	James Buchanan Macaulay (talk)	Cleanup
3,316	Ultraviolet index (talk)	Cleanup
246	Jean Marais (talk)	Cleanup
2	Constituency PP-241 (Bahawalnagar-V) (talk)	Expand
10	Argentine Academy of Cinematography Arts and Sciences Awards (talk)	Expand
2	Constituency PP-285 (Rahimyar Khan-I) (talk)	Expand
13	Manaki Brothers Film Festival (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
49	Lower Dir District (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8	Sardar Yaqoob Nasar (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
54	2018–2019 Iranian general strikes and protests (talk)	Merge
135	Focolare Movement (talk)	Merge
123	Award or decoration (talk)	Merge
10	S. Venkata Mohan (talk)	Wikify
4	Rossiter Johnson (talk)	Wikify
70	Welfare in New Zealand (talk)	Wikify
2	Backroads Pragmatists (talk)	Orphan
13	Inside of a Dog (talk)	Orphan
43	Dilawar Khan (politician) (talk)	Orphan
5	Bangladesh National Film Award for Best Screenplay (talk)	Stub
20	Iftikhar Cheema (talk)	Stub
3	Kajsa Bergström (talk)	Stub
9	Imtiaz Ahmed Shaikh (talk)	Stub
3	Janice Rankin (talk)	Stub
54	Ali Nawaz Khan Mehar (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:10, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Buckeye1971! You created a thread called How detailed should verification and (possibly conflicting) documentation of content go? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carol Veazie (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read the criteria for a person to have a Wikipedia article. This article doesn't show how Veazie meets the notability guidelines in the criteria.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carol Veazie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Carol Veazie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:45, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Carol Veazie concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Carol Veazie, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Carol Veazie

Hello, Buckeye1971. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Carol Veazie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! TheImaCow (talk) 04:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list

Hi Buckeye1971! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:33, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]