User talk:Bucinskas

AfC notification: Draft:TrackDuck has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:TrackDuck. Thanks! LaMona (talk) 00:04, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TrackDuck (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eyesnore was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TrackDuck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eye snore 12:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bucinskas, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eye snore 12:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TrackDuck has been accepted

TrackDuck, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 10:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TrackDuck

The article TrackDuck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found. Article is cited to passing mentions, routine annoucements and / or WP:SPIP sources. The company has raised $200,000 which strongly suggests it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia entry. Created by Special:Contributions/Bucinskas with no other contributions outside this topic. The company itself has been acquired by a nn company, InVision, so there's no opportunity for further independent notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TrackDuck company logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TrackDuck company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bug and issue tracking systems

Template:Bug and issue tracking systems has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]