User talk:Bubishist

August 2021

Hello, I'm Jingiby. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Asen dynasty seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 18:39, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Albanian Canadians. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 18:45, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Siege of Plevna. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the information is, as you claim already cited in the article, it should be trivial to add a citation to a reliable source which confirms this, since that citation should already be somewhere in the article... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Siege of Plevna, you may be blocked from editing. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- Please remember that this is a collaborative project, so you must be prepared to hear out the concerns of others with your edits. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bubishist reported by User:RandomCanadian (Result: ). Thank you. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Siege of Plevna. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:27, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Looks like there's an instance of obvious block evasion by Special:Contributions/151.38.90.15... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 11:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Bubishist, I've reblocked you for 48h from now. If you evade your block again, you risk being indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:05, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just for the record, I've already pinged Bbb23 on the affected page, but now there's also Special:Contributions/2001:B07:6469:985D:40F7:C11E:EC15:B67D... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:13, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As promised, the block is now indefinite.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:04, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]