Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Gerryshon254! Thank you for your contributions. I am DRAGON BOOSTER and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 08:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recurring Word

Wvdp (talk) 20:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

]] =

 Calton | Talk 05:39, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gerrishon Sirere and Wikipedia:Gerrishon Sirere

Hi Gerryshon254! It looks like you created two pages in different namespaces regarding the same exact content, and these edits appear to be tests made on your part to simply experiment and observe changes. I went ahead and combined the histories of these two pages into one page at Gerrishon Sirere, and them moved it to your user sandbox at User:Gerryshon254/sandbox. This will be the best place for this page, as it's out of the way and in your personal sandbox. You'll be able and welcome to continue testing and playing with the source code on the page here, and you won't have any issues with editors and treating the page as a live article. Please message me here if you have any questions and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. I hope you have a great day and I wish you happy editing. Best regards - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:42, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Onel

Hello

May 2018

Your addition to User:BubblySnowflake/sandbox has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 20:19, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mubaraka Mwinshehe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mubaraka Mwinshehe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.chimbukoletu.com/2013/09/kifo-cha-mbaraka-kilitumiwa-kisiasa.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 12:21, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kajiado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ngong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 22:22, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BubblySnowflake, you have been warned previously about improper attempts at self-promotion in which you submitted hoaxes and false pages about yourself. And, again, only last month you were found falsifying your user page by duplicating my user page and bio as your own. You have been notified that persistence in creating any more false pages would result in a block from Wikipedia. [1] Yet, now it is found that you have chosen to pass off User:Ira Leviton’s biography and accomplishments as your own by copying their user page as your own while only changing their name to yours. (E.g., you are not a veteran editor III, you did not receive those barnstars, you did not create that list of articles, that is not your biography, you are not a medical doctor living in NYC for 58 years, etc., etc. etc.) I have blocked you from editing until you can provide assurance that you understand Wikipedia policy. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 22:26, 29 June 2018 (UTC) Hi, I have keenly gone through Wikipedia's policy and I have learned a great deal about disruptive editing and all Wikipedia's rules. I hereby tender my sincere apologies.BubblySnowflake (talk)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BubblySnowflake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have gone through all wikipedia"s policies and I will adhere to all rules. I have learned a great deal from my past mistakes and which I regret and will not repeat again BubblySnowflake (talk) 16:53, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given that you have read and ignored previous warnings, we'll need more than vague generalities to assure us that the problems will not recur. Huon (talk) 17:58, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BubblySnowflake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The previous warnings were for copyrighted content and I refrained from that. I have never been warned about disruptive editing. This was my first warning. So what other warnings are you talking ng about?? BubblySnowflake (talk) 18:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Thanks for letting us know you are too incompetent to edit here, needing to be warned about disruptive editing. Given that, I suggest you go looking for other websites because clearly Wikipedia isn't for you. Yamla (talk) 21:20, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.