User talk:Bubbles Green

Welcome!

Hello, Bubbles Green, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Cookie Crap, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 43?9enter (talk) 02:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cookie Crap

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Cookie Crap, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 43?9enter (talk) 02:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If that is true it goes on Uncyclopedia.

--Bubbles Green (talk) 02:45, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Cookie Crap, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:18, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh come on! I was just trying to be funny!

--Bubbles Green (talk) 17:53, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Petrifaction (emotion)

The article Petrifaction (emotion) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTDICT

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. elektrik SHOOS 18:19, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You used the {{helpme}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{helpme}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the new contributors help desk, the help desk, or join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access.

edit notice

Delete my stupid editnotice

Speedy deletion nomination of Hi Joe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hi Joe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 01:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh paa-lease! What did my friend do wrong? Me, Yoshi Girl and Bubbles Green are great friends!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cute Yoshi (talk • contribs) 01:47, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Exploding brain

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Exploding brain, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LiteralKa (talk) 23:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

What

{{helpme}} What time is it?

This is not an appropriate use of the {{helpme}} template—please use {{helpme}} only for questions related to Wikipedia. Moreover, you are blocked; to request an unblock, please use the {{unblock}} template. Intelligentsium 00:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:29, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bubbles Green (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I find this what you call vandalism funny, it's just not vandalism to me. I like to be funny, and I find this Cookie Crap stuff funny!!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:22, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unfair Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bubbles Green (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't think that's fair to block me because that Cookie Crap stuff was what I find funny and I will not do it again because:

   * I understand it was vandalism
   * I will only make good contributions from now on
   * I will NOT vandalize or abuse Wikipedia

Hey, a permablock?! That's sooooooo unfair!!!

Sad.gif

Decline reason:

If you had one constructive edit (or even what might be considered an attempt at a constructive edit) to the encyclopedia in your contribution history, I would be willing to entertain this unblock request. However, all of your edits have been unconstructive and the title of this subheading ("Unfair Block") seems to indicate that you do not fully accept or recognize the rationale behind it (to prevent further disruption to the encyclopedia). Thus, I cannot justify an unblock. Kinu ^t/_c 19:50, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rfvgvr

redirect New Divide — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.92.23.80 (talk) 03:49, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]