User talk:Bubbles4sale

Welcome!

Hello, Bubbles4sale, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV), and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ·:· Will Beback ·:· 21:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back, Auno3

Please read Wikipedia:Sock puppetry, especially Circumventing policy:

Policies apply per person, not per account. Policies such as 3RR are for each person's edits. Using a second account for policy violations will cause any penalties to be applied to your main account. Users who are banned or blocked from editing may not use sock puppets to circumvent this. Evading a block or ban causes the timer on the block to restart, and may further lengthen it.

Have a nice day. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 06:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to African American. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. adding a mugshot is not helpful to the article and is considered vandalism since you added it and reverted to it twice now. ~Jeeny ^(talk) 07:02, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop, inappropriately, linking many unrelated articles to Disappearance and murder of Jessie Davis. It is very disruptive. ~Jeeny ^(talk) 07:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just because of negative exposure? Their names are Bobby Cutts and Jessie Davis.

Suspected sock puppet notice

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Auno3 (3rd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 08:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been indefinitely blocked, because evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Auno3 (3rd) has shown that this account is a sockpuppet or meatpuppet of User:Auno3 used to circumvent Wikipedia policies. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Akhilleus (talk) 17:12, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bubbles4sale (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Indef block eh?? There is no evidence to show I am associated with User:Auno3. Just because of an "obsession" with Bobby Cutts? That page has been edited by hundreds of people, and Jessie Davis and Bobby Cutts are both known by their first and last names. I added Bobby Cutts/Jessie Davis names to "Cutts", "Davis", etc and was blocked for bringing possible negative light to the black race, which some editors are not happy with. Such is the reverse discrimination. My record shows no other blocks.

Decline reason:

Sufficient evidence presented. — Yamla 18:52, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.