User talk:Brunellus

Oxford Calculators

Hi, I see you created an article about the Oxford Calculators. I adapted there some text from the "Thomas Bradwardine" article. If you see problems in these new paragraphs, feel free to edit them (of course). Since you study medieval philosophy, you may be better equipped than me to evaluate its accuracy. Welcome to Wikipedia. --Leinad ¬ »saudações! 13:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Leinad - that was a scarily fast response! When I have the time, I'll have a further edit of the text you've brought over from the Thomas Bradwardine article. As it stands, I think it's too detailed for the Oxford Calculators article, and it also ignores the controversy over how significant the Calculators' work really was. Thanks for the welcome! --Brunellus 14:55, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Greetings Brunellus! I had another go at the Scholasticism article to address the little problem you raised there about century boundaries. In the course of this I stumbled across Gregory of Rimini which is an abomination - I wonder if there is something we could do about this one? Peter Damian (talk) 07:42, 1 June 2008 (UTC) [edit] I have had a go at it. Do feel free to add your greater expertise in this area. Peter Damian (talk) 08:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas greetings

This is very strange indeed. It turns out the entire period did not even exist. Peter Damian (talk) 14:26, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History of Mathematics revisited

Brunellus

Thanks for drawing my attention to the Oxford Handbook of the History of Mathematics. The chapters in the table of contents (and their authors) are impressive -- and show the cultural and chronological breadth of current history of mathematics. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 22:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Ronald Latham, from its old location at User:Brunellus/Ronald Latham. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. » Shadowowl | talk 10:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ronald Latham (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add references that show that Latham has been written about in depth by multiple reliable, independent publications. Please also expand to provide further context. What did he achieve in his life? What is he known for?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ronald Latham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ronald Latham, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brunellus! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ronald Latham

Hello, Brunellus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ronald Latham".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 14:49, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]