User talk:Brshar

Welcome!

Hello, Brshar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 01:05, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @ronz Sorry that i did incorrectly claim ownership of those photos , it was when i first started here and I didn’t know what i was doing , the correct sources are:

Danielle Campbelle image: https://www.instagram.com/p/Ba5TT5oF2Qf/?utm_source=ig_share_sheet&igshid=1b39k8eg5m15k

Niki Taylor image: http://niki-taylor-fan.tumblr.com

Regarding Nidhi Sunil page, i don’t know what more I can do to fact check the information, as well as famous birthdays Having it listed on that day and about 3 more websites i found and had credited, her official website has the same date: https://nidhisunil.carbonmade.com/about

I am still still trying to learn how to prevent my contributions being seen as disgenuine in future , Does the person who changed her age without any sources not get questioned too?

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Brshar. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 04:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - that is not true , i am not being paid for my contributions and all of them are accurate and have proper citations

Hi Ron,

Yes can you show me what images? I will have either taken them from her boyfriends blog or from her, her manager Phoenix or her boyfriends Instagram stories or Instagram live depending on the quality - did i not credit the photo? I can’t see which image you are referring to here, I’m trying to contribute where I think it makes a difference and I felt like the sources I was using were better than what they replaced :/

Thanks for responding.

this and this.

They are credited as your own work. --Ronz (talk) 18:49, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No conflict of interest

Hi there - i don’t understand exactly how this change is a conflict of interest , everything is factual and site sourced. I am a huge Maty Noyes fan, and it seems strange to have such a basic profile missing career highlights. Brshar (talk) 04:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~It appears you are being paid for your contributions. Please stop making further edits to articles until we can work this out.~~

Can you please explain where you obtained the images you uploaded? --Ronz (talk) 22:43, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to think you are just a fan, but could you please answer the question about the images? --Ronz (talk) 02:42, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding. I've asked for help here. --Ronz (talk) 04:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As for Nidhi Sunil, I suggest first taking some time to learn Wikipedia far better. Editing biographical information requires strict adherence to Wikipedia's content policies, and falls under special editing restrictions as well. The welcome message at the top of this page provides some good ways to learn Wikipedia. --Ronz (talk) 04:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And you should request both images be deleted per the response to my request for help. --Ronz (talk) 16:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello Brshar. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Meredith Mickelson, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Brshar. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Brshar|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 05:29, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there , i have no financial benefit from Meredith Mickelson although i wish I did lol , thank you for pointing that out however for future articles I will know however this is not the case here Brshar (talk) 06:08, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? GSS ^💬 06:17, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - no financial gain , therefore I do not mind if it is not possible to alter or create this page , however I just tried to edit the super-spreaders page and it will not allow me (reference 21 has no active link), could you reallow me to edit? Brshar (talk) 06:20, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay so, based on some off-wiki evidence you were hired to create a page on Wikipedia for Meredith Mickelson and, I will be sharing those details with an admin soon so, it's your choice how you want to respond. Thank you. GSS ^💬 06:41, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for engaging in undisclosed paid editing. I have seen GSS's evidence, and I am more than convinced that you are lying about accepting payments for creating Wikipedia articles.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:09, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - i have made edits to subjects i know about , i thought that was the best way to start on this platform , this article is not a paid edit and i am not being paid by this person nor have I ever been (that does not mean i do not know them nor does it mean they do not warrant a Wikipedia page!) . Can i see the evidence you refer to? Brshar (talk) 11:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not easily; if you check your SEOclerks profile you'll see that they pulled your advert after it was reported to them... at least one freelancing site has the decency to ensure that its users are working honestly; if only Fiverr and Upwork would follow suit. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:25, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was the opposite - i was asking about page creation not offering it as a service Brshar (talk) 12:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And that was on the talk page for this article where i posted requesting help not seoclerk Wikipedia page Brshar (talk) 12:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Meredith Mickelson

Hello, Brshar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Meredith Mickelson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:38, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]