User talk:Brownr@westminster-mo.edu

Welcome!

Hello, Brownr@westminster-mo.edu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 16:44, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Naming college articles

Hi there! I've noticed you've started up several articles about closed colleges, which is of course very appreciated. However, when you're naming them, it looks like you've been including the state automatically in the title. I just wanted to let you know that it's best not to do that. Locations are only included in college entry titles when we're trying to separate two colleges with the same name -- for example, all of the many Saint John's Colleges. If a college is the only one with its name and yet the location identifier is still included, it makes it seem like there's another one out there in a different location.

I have moved I think two of your articles already so that they don't carry the location anymore, but if you could refrain from including it in the future, that would be most appreciated. :) Also, you may be interested in reading the *Manual of Style so that you can avoid your articles being marked for clean-up. Beginning 17:37, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, citing your own blog?

How is citing your own blog aligned with Wikipedia:Verifiability? If something has its own reference, or information then maybe you should be citing that rather than your own iteration from your blog. Do also remember WP:COI — billinghurst sDrewth 04:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]