User talk:Browneyes50

March 2022

If you continue to add CN tags indiscriminately to articles (at a rapid clip), you risk being blocked. Stop it.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But , they not confirmet yet we need source Browneyes50 (talk) 19:03, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your tagging demonstrates that you have neither judgment nor experience - or are being deliberately disruptive.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I dont delete any text how can you say i disruptive ? I just add cn tag to article so we can confirm where that text came from is under wikipedia policy. And if the text is already confirmed i dont add CN tag. You dont confirm where that text came from, and when sameone say they need citation confirmed you say that distruptive. That break wikipedia rule, for reliable source Browneyes50 (talk) 19:08, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I even dont delete text without confirmed source. Just add cn tag or unrealable source how can you say that distruptive? Add cn tag so the other editor can check where that text came from so they can change that text or diccuss in talk page Browneyes50 (talk) 19:13, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And i edit article from my wikipedia page suggestion. Why you attack me indiscrimally? And threat me with block when i not even delete any text Browneyes50 (talk) 19:15, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When someone add year birth without cn , add cn tag so we are now where that text came from. And when someone add about opinion about other author , i add cn tag too. This just like you attack and threat me with block . When i even dont delete and destroy any article Browneyes50 (talk) 19:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is like you forbid new editor to diccus and learn about reliable source. And when the ask about source and citation you threat them with block . I even dont delete any text and you say i distruptive Browneyes50 (talk) 19:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So i ask you what wikipedia rule i break? I dont delete any text without source, and i even dont delete any text with unrealable source. I not vandalism any artice. I add Cn tag with text without source , i have skill to read fast so i can edit with rapid pace. So you say someone is forbidden to add CN tag in article without source ? Browneyes50 (talk) 19:35, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And stop "correcting" grammar. Your English skills are terrible, and your change was incorrect.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:00, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not threat me and insult me individually . Can you use polite speech ? Browneyes50 (talk) 20:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not bite the newcomers Understand that newcomers are both necessary for and valuable to the community. By helping newcomers, we can increase the range of knowledge, perspectives, and ideas on Wikipedia, thereby preserving its neutrality and integrity as a resource and ultimately increasing its value. Browneyes50 (talk) 20:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! You can quote WP:NOBITING.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It must be fun for you to insult and bite newcomer

Browneyes50 (talk) 20:52, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

very sad your use your time just for blocking kid with age 15 to have fun edit in wikipedia Browneyes50 (talk) 22:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Negitota per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Negitota. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 21:12, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Browneyes50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dont doing any distruptive edit or delete any text in wikipedia. You can read add my contribution history. I just add Cn tag and write new article or grammarBrowneyes50 (talk) 21:15, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block. — Voice of Clam 21:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

They think i new sock pupper because i edit wikipedia page the other sock puppet edit. But i just barely new edit malaysia philosopher page and accidentally same with that sock puppet. That page is barely have text and need contributor , i just add new text not delete anything. You can see my history contribution . I dont doing anything distruptive. I even edit page wikipedia suggest to me. This is not fair , i dont delete or distrup any text wikipedia and i label as sockpuppet. And they block me even with indefinitely time. So i cannot edit wikipedia in my life time forever ? Browneyes50 (talk) 21:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Browneyes50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

They think i new sock pupper because i edit wikipedia page the other sock puppet edit. But i just barely new edit malaysia philosopher page and accidentally same with that sock puppet. That page is barely have text and need contributor , i just add new text not delete anything. You can see my history contribution . I dont doing anything distruptive. I even edit page wikipedia suggest to me. This is not fair , i dont delete or distrup any text wikipedia and i label as sockpuppet. And they block me even with indefinitely time. So i cannot edit wikipedia in my life time forever ? Browneyes50 (talk) 21:40, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Without going into the sockpuppetry issue, I think your English is not good enough to edit here. Perhaps you should edit the Wikipedia in your native language (Malay?) — Daniel Case (talk) 06:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Browneyes50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, i can do that. But can you change my block for indefinitely time to have definite time or fixed duration ? If you can do that, i will accept my block reason. Indefinitely just doesn't feel fair to me. ThanksBrowneyes50 (talk) 06:28, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's just the way it is. I have revoked your talk page access because you have made too many disruptive requests. Graham87 09:02, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.