User talk:BroughtToYouByMolly
Regarding this comment
[edit]For starters, the only diatribes in this situation were posted by an IP address and have been collapsed, struck out or removed. Your implication that Jed was subject to any diatribe is false, and may be construed as a personal attack which could result in sanctions against you. One of the principles of Wikipedia is that we always assume good faith on the part of our fellow editors. This is not a threat, simply a friendly bit of advice. Because Wikipedia is built on consensus, it can be extremely harmful to one's ability to contribute to consistently use disparaging language when referring to others.
Regarding the issue of the POV of the article, Wikipedia has strict, explicit rules regarding how we write about fringe theories, which this subject absolutely qualifies as. The problem is that Jed Stuart has had it explained to him multiple times that we cannot violate WP policy simple because he interprets one source as taking a less skeptical stance than Wikipedia is required to take. Whether or not that source actually does so is, itself, a matter of some contention. Please take the time to familiarize yourself with the links I have provided above. Below this message is a templated message which it is normal to deliver to new users when they begin editing in certain areas. Please also read it carefully, including the disclaimer at the beginning. Also, welcome to Wikipedia! We all hope you have a good time editing here, and become a productive and helpful editor!
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 20:09, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit] | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Beautifulpeoplelikeyou (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —DoRD (talk) 01:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC) |
Formal mediation has been requested
[edit]The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Electronic Harassment NPOV". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 23 September 2016.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 06:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected
[edit]The request for formal mediation concerning Electronic Harassment NPOV, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 19:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)