User talk:Brotos

Speedy deletion of Broom cannon

A tag has been placed on Broom cannon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. H2H (talk) 06:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Broom cannon

I have nominated Broom cannon, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broom cannon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 06:38, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If what you are saying is true, we delete the article first and wait for a hundred years. Sincerely with no hard feelings, H2H (talk) 07:05, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can't make it into an official page; if you want to be a successful wikipedian, read these pages

H2H (talk) 07:19, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a note on the talk page of Broom cannon, but I might as well add it here as well. I think you should consider using a site like Wikia to host your article. The notability standards of Wikipedia tend to be quite stringent, and I personally doubt if your article will be allowed to stay undeleted. --Blehfu (talk) 07:34, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake

I'm afraid your mistaken; I believe that "Broom Cannon" is NOT encyclopedic. Therefore, I think it should be deleted. H2H (talk) 07:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded rudeness

My comments above was not rude. I'm sorry if you are offended but I thought you are trying to fool me or something, but hey; I'm Sorry. H2H (talk) 08:00, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]