User talk:Illuminismus

Welcome!

Hello, Illuminismus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Ian Cairns 23:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia

Hello Brother Fancis. First of all thanks for starting to contribute to Wikipedia. In terms of sources, Wikipedia has an attribution policy, that states that everything in Wikipedia needs to have already been published in a reliable source. Reliable sources are things like books, journals, etc, but don't include self-published sources such as personal websites or blogs. So for the article you started you need to add references throughout using either the Hardvard referencing style or using the new <ref> tags. For more information about how to do this please see WP:CITE.

As to your second question, about disambiguation. Wikipedia has thousands of disambiguation pages and hundreds of thousands of links to disambiguation pages, but the guideline is that ideally there should be no links made to disambiguation pages, but that the link should be sent to the precise location. (See WP:DPL which states "Wikipedia articles should not link to disambiguation pages (with rare exceptions where the ambiguity of a term is being discussed); instead links should go directly to the appropriate article." There are many editors who are tirelessly working on disambiguating links, see here. So, you should never link to the British article but that is a disambiguation page; if you don't think United Kingdom is appropriate, change it to the History of the UK or some other article, but don't leave it at British, because as noted above that is a disambiguation page. Regards, -- Jeff3000 14:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

Hello! I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject England. We work on creating, expanding and making general changes to England related articles. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Project Page!. Thank You.

Default category sorting

Hi. I noticed you added a category to The Lottie Project and I thought I could save you some work by letting you know that if an article has a default sort tag above the categories then you only need to add the category and the tag will automatically ensure it's listed alphabetically by the name specified in the default sort tag. So DEFAULTSORT:Lottie Project, The (typed in double curly brackets to make it a working tag) means all the categories will be sorted to that default unless specified otherwise. My explanation sounds confusing but if you go back to look at the article then you'll see what I mean. If you look out for default sort tags on articles (or even add them yourself where appropriate) then it'll save you extra typing. :-) Random Passer-by (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

James, La gloria è a dio has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Notability of Bernd Weikl

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bernd Weikl, by Hu (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bernd Weikl seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bernd Weikl, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Bernd Weikl itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I noticed, by chance, that Bernd Weikl, was mentioned in about half a dozen wiki articles. A quick search on the internet turned up a number of web sites with biographies for Weikl, so I created a stub article saying, as I recall, "Bern Weikl (born whenever) is a baritone born wherever," and linked the other articles to it. However his notability was challenged and the article speedily deleted. I think he is probably notable (although at the lower end of the spectrum of notability) but the article would have needed further work to demonstrate that. Another time perhaps.

Brother Francis 07:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from a member of the Opera Project. I'm sorry that I missed this speedily-deleted article, and will resurrect it when I have a moment. Weikl has an article in New Grove Dictionary of Opera and is undoubtedly an important contemporary singer (now nearing the end of his career). Best wishes. --GuillaumeTell 11:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, Bro (couldn't resist that). The article has risen from the dead. It would be nice to know when he debuted at the Vienna Staatsoper. --GuillaumeTell 00:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Berkshire WikiProject invitation

File:Berks arms.gif

Hello, Illuminismus! I'd like to invite you to join the Berkshire WikiProject. It's a user-group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Berkshire-related content. There is a discussion page for sharing ideas as well as developing and getting tips on improving articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of members.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We hope to be working with you in the future!

Seaserpent⁸⁵ 01:32, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Crucifixion (Stainer)

Okay, it sounds notable. I put together a little stub on it: The Crucifixion (Stainer). Please have a look at it and if you think you can improve on it (and you probably can, having performed it), please do so. TJRC (talk) 18:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Holy cats, it was only up for two minutes before someone made its first edit. TJRC (talk) 18:01, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Presentation College, Reading

{{adminhelp}}. The page Presentation College, Reading seems to have been deleted and left a number of red links. I last saw it on about 13th October 2008 and I don't think it has been cited in a subsequent deletion discussion. Can this be investigated, please?

By the way, my monastic sounding user name may suggest a connection with Presentation College, but there is none. As a resident of Berkshire I know the place, but little more than that. "Brother Francis" is just a user name!

Brother Francis (talk) 18:18, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article you linked to has never existed, and there is nothing in your deleted contribs. Have you got the name wrong perhaps?--Jac16888 (talk) 19:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the prompt response. I was convinced that a link to Presentation College, Reading had gone from Presentation College, but I see from the history that's simply not the case. I must have imagined the page. Thanks again for checking. Brother Francis (talk) 23:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Half a crown

I have nominated Half a crown, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Half a crown. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. BUC (talk) 20:45, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Half a crown

I have nominated Half a crown, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Half a crown. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. BUC (talk) 20:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gareth Edwards (producer)

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Gareth Edwards (producer). The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 01:43, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gareth Edwards (producer)

The article Gareth Edwards (producer) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 06:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First ever Reading Wiki Meetup

You are invited to the first ever Reading Wiki Meetup which will take place at Copa, 76-78 Kings Road, Reading, RG1 3BJ on Sunday 23 September 2012 from 1.00 pm.

I hope as many people as possible will be able to attend so that we can make this a regular event. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Berkshire related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]