User talk:BrotherNoi

Welcome!

Hello, BrotherNoi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Scray (talk) 13:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here to build an encyclopedia?

Based on your recent edits at User Talk:Erythema, you may want to reconsider why you're here. Editing on behalf of a blocked editor won't be well-received. If you're here to help build an encyclopedia, then you are welcome here. If you're here for some other reasons, please go somewhere else. -- Scray (talk) 13:30, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't yet edited Wikipedia, but is it not allowed for a brother of a blocked person to create an account? I think to block a newbie per WP:NOTHERE after just one post is premature. Thanks. BrotherNoi (talk) 20:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrotherNoi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm a brother of member InLoveNoi. I personally don't think I have committed anything wrong. Posting on user's talk page about the situation as I see it.. That's really bloodthirsty to be blocked just for that. But I don't really wonder, when I seen admin denying use of WP:MEDRS for my brother's edits on Colloidal Silver. The admin said: you cannot use or post WP:MEDRS compliant sources because I (admin) seldom use it.

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, which will not be released unless by an admin with checkuser responsibility. And as you are either a sockpuppet or just possibly a meatpuppet it seems unlikely. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:12, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrotherNoi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm staying together with my brother and we are using the same computer. Thanks.

Decline reason:

Your sole edits have been to continue the argument of a blocked user - as you have admitted to wP:BROTHER, that shows that you are indeed a meatpuppet of that editor. Editors may share computers - however, they may not either a) edit the same articles, or b) continue the same arguments. Since your sole work is based on b) there is and will not be any valid reason for unblocking. Note now: both you AND your brother are BOTH prohibited from editing this project either anonymously OR through a userid (✉→BWilkins←✎) 15:00, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrotherNoi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

LOLZ. WP:MYBROTHER is not a policy. "This page is intended as humor. It is not, has never been, nor will ever be, a Wikipedia policy or guideline." - Citation of the same essay. :And sorry, the above mentioned essay is referring to edits made from the same account. Cannot be applied here In My Humble Opinion. I have created account and posted the message on the talk page on my own accord. I'm independent from my brother, and often don not agree with him. Lol I did not continue "the same behavior as another user in the same context". I ddin't create multiple accounts, didn't go to DRN. I just posted a message on user's talk page giving my own view. The block is premature. Per WP:SHARE appealing the block. :) BrotherNoi (talk) 12:52, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will not be unblocked in order to continue the same disruption and arguments that your "brother" was blocked for. WP:BROTHER may not be a policy, but WP:MEAT is. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 17:46, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrotherNoi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

WP:MEAT says "Do not recruit your friends". I wasn't recruited. It was in Stalin's times that relatives of someone who "committed mistakes" would suffer, even though they didn't do any such actions. LOL Wouldn't expect to see the same attitude instead of AGF here :-). Request unblock for I cannot be blocked merely on assumptions. Thanks.

Decline reason:

There's a saying. If it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, it's a duck. If your edits are indistinguishable in behavior and technically from those of your "brother", then we cannot AGF that you are not the same person. Also, invoking Stalin? Constant "LOLZ"? As you are WP:WIKILAWYERING and refusing to take this seriously, your talk page access has been revoked. Further unblock requests can be directed to the Ban Appeals Subcommittee at arbcom-appeals-enlists.wikimedia.org - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:49, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are using the same computer to continue the same contentious editing that led to your "brother's" block. You are technically and behaviourally indistinguishable from each other and that is against Wikipedia policy (A new user who engages in the same behavior as another user in the same context, and who appears to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, may be subject to the remedies applied to the user whose behavior they are joining). Your continued attempt to Wikilawyer your way out of a sound block based on clear policy violations will only lead to your talk page access being revoked.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 17:45, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]