User talk:Bronayur

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Bronayur! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button

located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Kukini 02:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Waverly NY, Tioga County

Hi!

I just wanted to thank you for really giving the Waverly page it's first major update in December of 2006. I know it's a little late, but Thanks a lot! The page is currently being 'recreated' by myself (whom makes alot of mistekes typing) So I saw I had some help from deXXus.

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.24.253.58 (talk) 06:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Binghamton proposal

I have made a proposal for a WikiProject for articles relating to Binghamton/Greater Binghamton/Triple Cities. You have edited a Binghamton related article(s). If you are interested in supporting the proposal (or not), you can view it, leave a comment and/or add your name as a potential member at:

WikiPedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Binghamton

Cheesebox 08:00, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manual Therapy vs Massage

Hi, I noticed that you redirected manual therapy to massage. I have undone this as massage is just one type of manual therapy, as the original article clearly stated. If you want to change an article in such a dramatic way, please discuss this on the article 'talk' page first. Thanks.Davwillev 20:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the copyvio accusations

I'm really, really sorry about falsely accusing you of cutting-and pasting. I wasn't looking at the diffs closely enough. I need to be more careful in examining diffs. However, in the future if someone reverts an edit and gives a reason in the edit summary, it's not a good idea to just revert it back (it made it appear as if you were ignoring my warning), but rather, post a comment on my page first or the talk page (e.g., "Hey, why did you revert my stuff? Show me where I cut and paste?"), or even just mention in the edit summary that I was mistaken. (Using edit summaries in general is considered good practice in Wikipedia). Still, 90% my fault. Carry on the good work. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As long as what you're adding is in your own words, don't worry about finding other copyright violations. It's very possible that some of the identifical content I found on other sites was copied from Wikipedia (which is actually legal). OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work

Thanks for using edit summaries. It's really helpful when you're looking over an article's history. Cheers, OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Thanks for taking the time to learn about Wikipedia guidelines and the "manual of style" while adding well-written and sourced content! OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:34, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

massage categories

I think you are going overboard with the massage categories. Just because the word "massage" appears in the article that doesn't mean the article belongs in that category. Maybe you should put in a little more thought into which ones you add. Ospinad 19:09, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi Bronayur

You wrote me a messege,

Hi there I see you are interested in massage if you would like to come over and help out that would be great.

I did not understand your messege and what you mean..--Astrolog 10:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help

Thanks for reverting vandalism on Larrys Creek on October 19. I appreciate your help keeping the article presentable while it was Today's Featured Article very much, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 19:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Head Massage

I see you have a history of working on the article Indian Head Massage. I am looking at it from the project Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles where it is one of the longest {{unreferenced}} tagged articles that does not meet at least the barest minimum of verifiability. It has been tagged and completely without references since June 2006. It would be extremely helpful if you had some references you could add to the article to help support its verifiability and notability. Thanks for any help you can give. BirgitteSB 21:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will look into this...Keep up the good work!Bronayur (talk) 00:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your dispute with the neutrality of the ACIM article

Dear Bronayer,

You've inserted the disputed-neutrality template on the ACIM page, but you seem to have not given any rationale for doing so on the article's talk page. Could you please explain your reasoning for inserting this template on the same article's talk page?

Thanks,

Scott P. (talk) 04:47, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sufi Saints of South Asia

Hello Bronayur. I notice that you are interested in Sufism. I have put forth a request on the Reward Board for assistance in bringing the Sufi Saints of South Asia article to at least B-class. All meaningful contributors will get barnstars. The article is in dire need of being developed. It is an important article in relation to the Islam in South Asia. Please help in developing the article. Regards--Shahab (talk) 06:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ungdomshuset March 1+2 (1).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ungdomshuset March 1+2 (1).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 08:01, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ungdomshuset March 1+2 (2).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ungdomshuset March 1+2 (2).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 18:11, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ungdomshuset March 1+2 (3).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ungdomshuset March 1+2 (3).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:54, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Bronayur! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 02:53, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion at Commons

An image you uploaded is the subject of discussion at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/PAHMC.--GrapedApe (talk) 02:09, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bronayur. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bronayur. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]