User talk:Broman178/Archive

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Broman178/Kolkata tram has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kolkata tram, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 08:15, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kolkata tram

Greetings, your draft Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kolkata tram is an excellent start, and the formatting is great, but the huge issue you need to address is the lack of sourcing.

The draft has a lot, a lot, of information, but only a small bit of it has footnoting. Clearly the information you're providing came from somewhere, but without clear footnotes a reader has no way of verifying these facts. Can you please give explicit footnotes for the material? Have you checked Indian news articles, checked GoogleBooks (especially for coverage of its early history), etc.

Post on my Talk page if you need any assistance. The article will eventually be a great addition, but we need to strengthen the sourcing first. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Kolkata tram was accepted

Kolkata tram, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lugia2453 (talk) 22:25, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Manchester Metrolink

Hello, I have replied to you at my talk page. --Jza84 | Talk 20:28, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Edits on Toy Story 2 Plot

I reverted your edits because you made the plot over 700 words and the plot needs to be under 700 words. And it is at a perfect 699 at the moment so i would like to keep it there. Koala15 (talk) 18:04, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 29 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Mow Cop page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peak District

Please do not add links to the Peak District inappropriately to articles that are not in it. It is extremely misleading, Bolsover not likely. Have you been there? Please remove the ones that are linked to articles outside the Peak District. J3Mrs (talk) 14:42, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your message, it was not my intention to mislead people by categorizing these places as tourist attractions within the Peak District or towns and villages within the Peak District so I do apologise if you thought that was the case. The only reason why I linked those articles up was because those places or tourist attractions were added as towns or attractions of the Peak District in some other websites online (for example Bolsover Castle is listed in the http://www.peakdistrictinformation.com/visits/houses.php website as an attraction within the Peak District even though it is not within the National Park, same with Hardwick Hall although that had been added from before, and a part of the Standedge tunnels lie within the National Park contrary to what you say) and the descriptions of both categories say "Tourist attractions in the Peak District, both within the National Park and in the broader region" and "Towns and villages in the Peak District area, whether falling within the boundary of the National Park or not." which means that these two categories do allows towns, villages and attractions which are not within the National Park as long as they lie close to it. Broman178 (talk) 08:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note I have undone your edit on the Standedge Tunnels because a part of the tunnels does actually lie within the National Park boundaries (if you look in the map you'll understand) and since there is a visitor centre for the tunnels, I see no reason why it is not part of the Peak District. I can understand your reasoning for the other places you reverted. Broman178 (talk) 13:12, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes just over half a mile of tunnel is in the Peak District but it is accessed by portals outside. The visitor centre is not in, nor is it associated with the Peak District in any way shape or form. I will remove it again. There are many other edits you should reverse. J3Mrs (talk) 15:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply, and I understand your reasoning which is why I will not revert that again, however, it is not as easy as you think to remove and reverse all the pages which are not associated with the Peak District because I don't want to face any more backlash with other Wikipedia users over whether they should remain in those categories or not, not to mention I unfortunately don't have enough time in hand as I'm not a regular editor and there are so many places which have been categorized either as Peak District attractions or towns and villages so its confusing as a result. I would suggest you leave a message about this matter in the Peak District talk page or change the descriptions in those categories so that only places within the National Park (or within very close proximity) can be included in the future and places not closely associated with the Peak District can be removed by other users (or I can leave a message myself, as there are many places not in close proximity to the National Park e.g. Hardwick Hall which had been added by other users), there already was a discussion years ago about this issue in the main Peak District page and it was then decided that places outside the National Park could be also included within the categories as long they they lie close to the National Park boundary or lie within the outer fringes in some way or another. Broman178 (talk) 17:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Allophones of /r/

Kushalpok01 (talk) 01:40, 22 July 2020 (UTC) I wanna ask you if we could add allophones of a language in help ipa page; I've noticed there is not a single separate row for the allophones of Nepali-[r] and [ɾ] are the allophones of /r/ in Nepali.They are not separate phonemes, but from what I understand we don't use square brackets for just phonemes rather for the actual phonetic transcription.Can I add ɽ allophone of ɖ? Could you please clear up?[reply]

Hi Kushalpok01, I have mostly been editing on the IPA Help page articles for a year so most of my edits are based on what I feel is appropriate, since most of the IPA help pages I have seen seem to mention allophones of the /r/ transcription in footnotes (for example Help:IPA/French mentions for the /ʁ/ phoneme - the transcription mostly for /r/ in French - that "The French rhotic /ʁ/ is usually uvular, but it varies by region. For example, in Quebec, [ʁ], [r] and [ʀ] are all used, but nowadays, most speakers pronounce [ʁ]." so I see nothing wrong with mentioning those allophones within the footnote as long as it is a common feature for most speakers. As for /ɽ/ I'm not quite as sure about its mention but I have no immediate plans to remove the footnote and I added that as I originally did add that symbol as a transcription (though the help page for Nepali was a mess back then as I used wrong IPA symbols for some of the transcriptions) although I moved it to a footnote as it wasn't a main phoneme of Nepali. I do hope my answer helps to some extent but if you are still unsure about mentioning them, I would suggest you contact Wikipedia Users who have edited in IPA help pages for a longer period of time like e.g. Kbb2, Aeusoes1, Nardog and see what they say about it. Many thanks. Broman178 (talk) 09:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I would definitely suggest that if you add a new post in someones talk page, it would be helpful to place it as a new section in the talk page and also add a title to it, as since you added your post under the Welcome to Wikipedia template here, it confused me for a moment and made me think you added a New Welcome to Wikipedia template as well as your query. Broman178 (talk) 10:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Edinburgh Waverley railway station

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Edinburgh Waverley railway station, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]