User talk:BrokenMirrors123

BrokenMirrors123, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi BrokenMirrors123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great Start !

I shall soon make an account myself, but I see you are up to good speed, thats nice.

Unexplained reverts

Please do not revert other editors edit without writing a reason in the edit summary. A reason for the revert is required for edits that are not considered vandalism. Thank you. Gloss • talk 20:29, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above. See WP:RV. Until you learn your way around Wikipedia, it would be best to use "Undo" instead with a clear explanation in the edit summary. --Ronz (talk) 20:32, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 14:23, 15 May 2014 (UTC) But it's true! BrokenMirrors123 (talk) 14:25, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 14:26, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrokenMirrors123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi ! I logged in today to find this and I just found out why these edits happened... my friend decided to find some wiki password stealer or something like that and cracked the browser cache when I logged out at school and then he decided to vandalize random pages and what not... if you can un-block I'd appreciate it cause I need this account for a project, thanks.

Decline reason:

As by your own admission this account is compromised, it cannot be unblocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:43, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrokenMirrors123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ah I see, "Your account, your problem" thing I guess ? Well thats understandable... is it ok if I can change my IP and make an account that I would only use at home because I really need to create a page as a project for our class.

Decline reason:

If any more edits similar to the recent ones occur, the new account will be swiftly identified and eliminated. Favonian (talk) 11:46, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BrokenMirrors123, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:30, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hi, please replace everything with the {{retired}} template as I no longer use this account, thank you. BrokenMirrors246 (talk) 09:42, 18 May 2014 (UTC) BrokenMirrors246 (talk) 09:42, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Acalycine^{(talk/contribs)} 10:40, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undone: This request has been undone. A sock tag has been placed instead. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:46, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]