User talk:Brojam/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

October 2016

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Arrow episodes into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Alex|The|Whovian^? 05:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Time for season pages

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of Arrow episodes. Alex|The|Whovian^? 02:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Flash Season 1 DVD.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Flash Season 1 DVD.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:09, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft:The Flash (season 3)

It has been created. You could try expanding it further if necessary. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Ratings template

I wanted to follow up with you on why the template was removed again. There are a few issues that exist, that are unlikely to be resolvable. First, the ratings information is literally the same information in the episode tables above it, just compiled in a different manner. Second, the template itself already stretches the width of the article, and since we cannot use scrolls (because of Wikipedia print), we're going to run out of space as the show goes on....kind of out of space already. If you start shrinking it, then it will be even more illegible to read. The graph itself is hard to follow because of all the different bars you're trying to keep focus on. Most bar graphs do not keep that many items because it is too hard to keep track of what you're looking at. The same is true for the data sheet below it, as you're cramming 100 episodes into a tiny space.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 17:35, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

@Bignole: Thanks for elaborating. Really appreciate it and you're right with a few more seasons most likely still to go, it would become way too confusing with scrollbars. Maybe if the show reaches 7+ seasons (unlikely but we will see), a graph with just the season averages would be more appropriate. If the graph is made smaller (less wide), would it be good to include it in the main show page since the information is not already present (ex. The Walking Dead)? Brojam (talk) 00:42, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

I don't think you need a graph for season averages, because people can easily compare 5 numbers to each other when they are lined up like that. It's just unnecessary. It's nice, but not necessary.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Arrow ratings

Template:Arrow ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alex|The|Whovian^? 01:07, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Brojam. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Flash vs. Arrow) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Flash vs. Arrow, Brojam!

Wikipedia editor GeoffreyT2000 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for re-accepting the AfC draft.

To reply, leave a comment on GeoffreyT2000's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Orphaned non-free image File:Flash vs. Arrow soundtrack cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flash vs. Arrow soundtrack cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Flash vs. Arrow

A tag has been placed on Draft:Flash vs. Arrow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:31, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Flash vs. Arrow listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Draft:Flash vs. Arrow. Since you had some involvement with the Draft:Flash vs. Arrow redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC)